Hi Ivaylo, thanks for your test report. On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 05:00:03PM +0100, Ivaylo Kostov wrote: Why is there again an attempt to use HR (v1) with the nanoBTS? It is a codec that this BTS hardware is known to never have supported. I am quite sure this has been discussed before. Was there some miscommunication / mis-definition of the test cases? Regards, Harald

(found this mail stuck in my outbox, sending late) On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:09:23AM +0100, Ivaylo Kostov wrote: Yes, we discussed TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH for the nanoBTS. I remember to be surprised because from some discussion it appeared that the nanoBTS supports HR, and I was expecting TCH/F only. While talking about codecs, the ip.access nanoBTS *should* in fact support the TCH/F_PDCH dynamic timeslots. Ivaylo, could you check whether that is part of your testing procedure and add it if not? ~N --

libbsc should be extended to handle those restrictions, i.e. reject a configuration containing HR codec or a osmocom-style dynamic channel on a bts model 'nanobts'.

Hi Ivaylo, Please could you share the goal and scope of these tests? And is there a publicly available definition of the test cases?

Please excuse typos. Written with a touchscreen keyboard. -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris CEO Fairwaves, Inc. https://fairwaves.co On Feb 3, 2017 5:00 PM, "Ivaylo Kostov" &lt;ikostov(a)sysmocom.de <mailto:ikostov@sysmocom.de>> wrote: Hi, Please find BTS test report, week5 2017. BTSes which has been tested with OsmoNITB are: - sysmoBTS1002 - octasic BTS3500 - ettus B200 - nanoBTS model:165G sysmoBTS1002 has been tested with the following 4 channel configurations: 6 TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH (Osmocom style dynamic timeslots) 3 TCH/F, 3 PDCH 3 TCH/H, 3 PDCH 6 TCH/F_PDCH (ip.access style dynamic timeslots) All test cases passed. ---------------------------------------------------- octasic BTS3500 has been tested with the next 2 channel configurations: 3 TCH/F, 3 PDCH 3 TCH/H, 3 PDCH All test cases passed. ----------------------------------------------------- ettus B200 has been tested with below channel configurations: 6 TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH (Osmocom style dynamic timeslots) 3 TCH/F, 3 PDCH 3 TCH/H, 3 PDCH 6 TCH/F_PDCH (ip.access style dynamic timeslots) All test cases passed. ------------------------------------------------------ During a weekly test of nanoBTS model:165G, an issue has been discovered. It is reported in redmine: https://osmocom.org/issues/1933 <https://osmocom.org/issues/1933> Short description: It was found that the initiated voice call drops immediately after B subscriber accepts the call, when nanoBTS (model 165G) and NITB is configured with dynamic channels: 3 TCH/H and 3 PDCH. Default voice codec tch-h hr has been selected. Remaining test cases passed. regards, Ivaylo -- ------------------------------ - Ivaylo Kostov &lt;ikostov(a)sysmocom.de <mailto:ikostov@sysmocom.de>> <mailto:ikostov@sysmocom.de <mailto:ikostov@sysmocom.de>> http://www.sysmocom.de/ ======================================================================= * sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH * Alt-Moabit 93 * 10559 Berlin, Germany * Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B * Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Director: Harald Welte ------------------------------