- OpenBSC - lists.osmocom.org

Sending '?' SMS Through VTY and Silent-SMS
by Ma Ma 03 Jul '15

03 Jul '15

Hi everyone, I was just wondering if it is possible to send '?' SMS through the VTY. I was also wondering if someone could provide an example on how to send a silent-sms, whenever I try to send one i get disconnected from the VTY. Regards, Mike

1 0

Random nanoBTS reboot
by Pierre Kim 28 Jun '15

28 Jun '15

Hello, I've been experiencing this bug ever since I started experimenting with OpenBSC. At first I thought it as a problem with unstable connection, but it continued to happen even after I connected to the nanoBTS directly through a switch. I used Wireshark to track down the cause and discovered that OpenBSC was responding too late to PING message from the nanoBTS. I am attaching the pcap file of the moment. This happens as soon as 1 hour from the first connection, sometimes it runs okay for 18 hours but I've never seen my nanoBTS running straight for more than 24hrs Please take a look into the log. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Tell me in case if you need more information Regards, Pierre Following is the log from openbsc console. Sat Jun 27 03:24:43 2015 <0004> bsc_init.c:286 bootstrapping RSL for BTS/TRX (0/0) on ARFCN 520 using MCC=450 MNC=9 LAC=1 CID=0 BSIC=63 TSC=7 Sat Jun 27 08:17:39 2015 <001a> ipa.c:246 Cannot send PING message. Reason: Broken pipe Sat Jun 27 08:17:39 2015 <001a> input/ipaccess.c:110 Unexpected return from ipa_ccm_rcvmsg_base (ret=-32) Sat Jun 27 08:17:39 2015 <001a> input/ipaccess.c:236 Sign link vanished, dead socket Sat Jun 27 08:17:39 2015 <001a> input/ipaccess.c:69 Forcing socket shutdown with no signal link set Sat Jun 27 08:20:51 2015 <001a> input/ipa.c:265 accept()ed new link from 192.168.28.31 to port 3002 Sat Jun 27 08:21:08 2015 <001a> input/ipa.c:265 accept()ed new link from 192.168.28.31 to port 3003 Sat Jun 27 08:21:11 2015 <0004> bsc_init.c:286 bootstrapping RSL for BTS/TRX (0/0) on ARFCN 520 using MCC=450 MNC=9 LAC=1 CID=0 BSIC=63 TSC=7 and sometimes without the error from ipa_ccm_rcvmsg_base Sun Jun 28 09:17:40 2015 <001a> input/ipaccess.c:236 Sign link vanished, dead socket Sun Jun 28 09:17:40 2015 <001a> input/ipaccess.c:69 Forcing socket shutdown with no signal link set Sun Jun 28 09:20:39 2015 <001a> input/ipa.c:265 accept()ed new link from 192.168.28.31 to port 3002 Sun Jun 28 09:20:56 2015 <001a> input/ipa.c:265 accept()ed new link from 192.168.28.31 to port 3003 Sun Jun 28 09:20:59 2015 <0004> bsc_init.c:286 bootstrapping RSL for BTS/TRX (0/0) on ARFCN 520 using MCC=450 MNC=9 LAC=1 CID=0 BSIC=63 TSC=7

1 0

NanoBTS for sale?
by brogan.tom.iii＠gmail.com 26 Jun '15

26 Jun '15

I would like to know if anyone has a Nanobts for sale hopefully under 500$. I'm looking for the 900MHz or 1800MHz ones, preferably the ones with SMA antenna connectors (the white square ones) without internal antennas. Doesn't matter if they are used/old/new, just something that works without issues :)

1 0

[PATCH 2/2] libbsc: Update a BTS's SIs when ms_max_power is changed from VTY.
by Alexander Chemeris 25 Jun '15

25 Jun '15

Otherwise you have to restart BTS or at least break the RSL connection to apply the change. -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris. CEO, Fairwaves, Inc. https://fairwaves.co

3 7

[PATCH] bssgp: Fix IMSI buffer size (Coverity)
by Jacob Erlbeck 19 Jun '15

19 Jun '15

Currently the size of the IMSI pointer is used instead of the size of the talloc'ed buffer. This commit changes the call to gsm48_mi_to_string to use the same value that has been used with talloc_zero_size(). The length is changed to 17 since that value is used for GSM_IMSI_LENGTH in openbsc. Fixes: Coverity CID 1040663 Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf --- src/gb/gprs_bssgp_bss.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/gb/gprs_bssgp_bss.c b/src/gb/gprs_bssgp_bss.c index 962bf2e..3a9012e 100644 --- a/src/gb/gprs_bssgp_bss.c +++ b/src/gb/gprs_bssgp_bss.c @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ #include "common_vty.h" +#define GSM_IMSI_LENGTH 17 + uint8_t *bssgp_msgb_tlli_put(struct msgb *msg, uint32_t tlli) { uint32_t _tlli = htonl(tlli); @@ -498,8 +500,8 @@ int bssgp_rx_paging(struct bssgp_paging_info *pinfo, if (!TLVP_PRESENT(&tp, BSSGP_IE_IMSI)) goto err_mand_ie; if (!pinfo->imsi) - pinfo->imsi = talloc_zero_size(pinfo, 16); - gsm48_mi_to_string(pinfo->imsi, sizeof(pinfo->imsi), + pinfo->imsi = talloc_zero_size(pinfo, GSM_IMSI_LENGTH); + gsm48_mi_to_string(pinfo->imsi, GSM_IMSI_LENGTH, TLVP_VAL(&tp, BSSGP_IE_IMSI), TLVP_LEN(&tp, BSSGP_IE_IMSI)); -- 1.9.1

2 1

[PATCH] bssgp/test: Add missing START/END printfs
by Jacob Erlbeck 18 Jun '15

18 Jun '15

Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf --- tests/gb/gprs_bssgp_test.c | 7 ++++++- tests/gb/gprs_bssgp_test.ok | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/gb/gprs_bssgp_test.c b/tests/gb/gprs_bssgp_test.c index 63abf8b..14ba4d1 100644 --- a/tests/gb/gprs_bssgp_test.c +++ b/tests/gb/gprs_bssgp_test.c @@ -173,10 +173,13 @@ static void test_bssgp_status(void) static void test_bssgp_bad_reset() { - struct msgb *msg = bssgp_msgb_alloc(); + struct msgb *msg; uint16_t bvci_be = htons(2); uint8_t cause = BSSGP_CAUSE_OML_INTERV; + printf("----- %s START\n", __func__); + msg = bssgp_msgb_alloc(); + msgb_v_put(msg, BSSGP_PDUT_BVC_RESET); msgb_tvlv_put(msg, BSSGP_IE_BVCI, sizeof(bvci_be), (uint8_t *)&bvci_be); msgb_tvlv_put(msg, BSSGP_IE_CAUSE, sizeof(cause), &cause); @@ -184,6 +187,8 @@ static void test_bssgp_bad_reset() msgb_bvci(msg) = 0xbad; msgb_bssgp_send_and_free(msg); + + printf("----- %s END\n", __func__); } static void test_bssgp_flow_control_bvc(void) diff --git a/tests/gb/gprs_bssgp_test.ok b/tests/gb/gprs_bssgp_test.ok index a011bee..83d633b 100644 --- a/tests/gb/gprs_bssgp_test.ok +++ b/tests/gb/gprs_bssgp_test.ok @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ BSSGP primitive, SAP 16777219, prim = 4, op = 0, msg = 0e 1f 84 f0 12 34 56 1b 8 BSSGP primitive, SAP 16777221, prim = 11, op = 2, msg = 41 07 81 27 BSSGP primitive, SAP 16777221, prim = 11, op = 2, msg = 41 07 81 05 04 82 04 d2 ----- test_bssgp_status END +----- test_bssgp_bad_reset START +----- test_bssgp_bad_reset END ----- test_bssgp_flow_control_bvc START Got message: 26 1e 81 2a 05 82 10 22 03 82 c0 40 01 82 08 11 1c 82 60 20 Got message: 26 1e 81 2a 05 82 10 22 03 82 c0 40 01 82 08 11 1c 82 60 20 3c 81 78 06 82 11 44 -- 1.9.1

1 0

[PATCH] Fix GSM900 ARFCN range check
by Mike McTernan (wavemobile) 18 Jun '15

18 Jun '15

Allow ARFCN 0 to be used in GSM900 band. Signed-off-by: Michael McTernan <mike.mcternan(a)wavemobile.com> Index: osmobss/openbsc/openbsc/src/libbsc/bsc_init.c =================================================================== --- osmobss.orig/openbsc/openbsc/src/libbsc/bsc_init.c 2015-06-03 11:36:16.114471430 +0100 +++ osmobss/openbsc/openbsc/src/libbsc/bsc_init.c 2015-06-18 08:53:14.116369178 +0100 @@ -379,10 +379,10 @@ static int bootstrap_bts(struct gsm_bts } break; case GSM_BAND_900: - if (bts->c0->arfcn < 1 || + if (bts->c0->arfcn < 0 || (bts->c0->arfcn > 124 && bts->c0->arfcn < 955) || bts->c0->arfcn > 1023) { - LOGP(DNM, LOGL_ERROR, "GSM900 channel must be between 1-124, 955-1023.\n"); + LOGP(DNM, LOGL_ERROR, "GSM900 channel must be between 0-124, 955-1023.\n"); return -EINVAL; } break;

1 0

openbsc: build system tweaks
by Andreas Rottmann 17 Jun '15

17 Jun '15

Here are a bunch of buildsystem tweaks for openbsc. I'm not sure whether it is warranted to group them as a patch series, as they are (should be) independent of each other.

3 9

[PATCH 1/2] libbsc: Abstract out SIs update/generation for a BTS into a separate function.
by Alexander Chemeris 15 Jun '15

15 Jun '15

The code to do that doesn't belong to the control interface, so abstract it out to a separate function gsm_bts_set_system_infos(). -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris. CEO, Fairwaves, Inc. https://fairwaves.co

2 2

[PATCH] libmsc: Improve 'max_power_red' VTY command.
by Alexander Chemeris 15 Jun '15

15 Jun '15

Changes: * Apply change even if the supplied value is odd, just warn that it is rounded. Previously the value was not set at all, which may have lead to a situation when a user thinks the BTS operating at low power, while it is running full power. * Apply change even if the supplied value is higher than the 24dB maximum suggested by the standard, just warn about this. UmSITE and probably other SDR based BTS support much wider power regulation range. * Apply change to the BTS over OML immediately. -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris. CEO, Fairwaves, Inc. https://fairwaves.co

2 2