Hi all,
After buying a super Sim Kit (16 in 1) from China, I tried the reader (green PCB inside a blue transparent plastic case with a blue LED) and SIM (identified as a fakesupersim) with pysim tool. However i am getting the following error:
/pySim-prog.py -n 26C3 -c 49 -x 262 -y 42 -z 1234 -j 1 -t auto
Insert card now (or CTRL-C to cancel)
Autodetected card type fakemagicsim
Generated card parameters :
> Name : 26C3
> SMSP : e1ffffffffffffffffffffffff058100945555ffffffffffff000000
> ICCID : 8949262427518313026
> MCC/MNC : 262/42
> IMSI : 262422461512085
> Ki : 7b74741a1ee14337ec23f9ab92a13648
> OPC : ccd867d60797d8d45354a51b3ef568ff
Programming ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./pySim-prog.py", line 530, in <module>
card.program(cp)
File "/home/nadicek/pysim/pysim/pySim/cards.py", line 231, in program
self._scc.update_binary('6f30', hplmn + 'ff' * (tl-3))
File "/home/nadicek/pysim/pysim/pySim/commands.py", line 53, in update_binary
return self._tp.send_apdu_checksw(pdu)
File "/home/nadicek/pysim/pysim/pySim/transport/__init__.py", line 87, in send_apdu_checksw
raise RuntimeError("SW match failed ! Expected %s and got %s." % (sw.lower(), rv[1]))
RuntimeError: SW match failed ! Expected 9000 and got 9804.
I checked mailing lists and haven’t found anybody who had similar problem with pysim. Also I have tried forcing different models of SIM, but nothing is working. Obviously I can remove this check from the script file (__init__.py in /pySim/transport), however somebody had a reason to put such condition there. I would like to ask if it is safe to remove that line of code and the purpose of that line of code.
Thanks a lot and best regards
Martin
> I don't understand. This callback will be called with data you need to
write
> to the network. In case of MTP Level3 you will need to wrap that around
the
> msgb you got.
I means: is the interaction with mtp3 layer implemented (is sending sccp
data by mtp3 implemented by the library?)?
Also, what about the reception of data from mtp3 layer. is that implemented
in the sccp lib.
I am asking these questions because I see the code of mtp3 in the lib but no
significant call is present in the sccp part of the lib.
Thank you for your help.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:05:28AM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> [translated from german]
> is it certain that we switch a channel to PDCH only when
> gprs mode != none?
A TS can be GSM_PCHAN_TCH_F_PDCH; those are the only ones for which we
send a PDCH ACT message.
We send a PDCH ACT message
- during init (CHANNEL OML's state changed to enabled -> send PDCH ACT),
- and upon channel release ack when pchan == GSM_PCHAN_TCH_F_PDCH.
So the question is, when we receive a channel release ack, could that be
the PDCH release and we switch PDCH right back on by accident? No, because
we only receive a chan rel ack when the *TCH/F* is being released.
That is because the PDCH release is initiated "internally" from the PDCH
DEACT, and thus this condition in common/rsl.c rsl_tx_rf_rel_ack() catches
on, which existed before dyn PDCH:
if (lchan->rel_act_kind != LCHAN_REL_ACT_RSL) {
LOGP(DRSL, LOGL_NOTICE, "%s not sending REL ACK\n",
gsm_lchan_name(lchan));
return 0;
}
In rsl_rx_rf_chan_rel() the rel_act_kind is set to LCHAN_REL_ACT_RSL, but
not in the rsl_rx_dyn_pdch().
This is analogous to the ip.access way -- the ip.access nanobts replies to
a PDCH DEACT with a PDCH DEACT ACK and doesn't send a separate channel
release ack.
Maybe we could set rel_act_kind to some new LCHAN_REL_ACT_IPAC_DYN_PDCH
for clarity? (But we shouldn't actually send a release ack, to stay
compatible.)
Even though it works as-is, we should indeed add another flag check:
- We do check the flags that no ACT/DEACT is already pending;
- And we do send a PDCH DEACT only if ts->flags & TS_F_PDCH_ACTIVE;
- But we would send a PDCH ACT despite ts->flags & TS_F_PDCH_ACTIVE.
This should never happen, but it would make sense to ensure that.
~Neels
Hi,
My name is Brackley Cassinga Form DRC, we run a community network called
pamoja net where we offer gsm services using osmocom open source software
and OC Base station.
Recently I have tried to install another base station as the same installed
but I could not find any resource guiding through all the steps to take to
run NIB on a base station.
I'm currently running Ubuntu and I will appreciate if you could guide me on
the installation of BSC,hlr,MSC , in order to run a basic gsm network.
Thank you. Regards
--
*Ir Brackley heshima Casinga **Pacifique*
*CEO and Founder of kwanzatechnologie*
KwanzaTechnologies ,GlobalElectronics
+243977265291 | +243977265291 | Pcassinga(a)gmail.com/
brackley(a)ensemblepourladifference.org
www.kwantechnologies.jimdosite.com <http://www.kwantechnologies.com/> |
Skype: Brackley cassinga <https://webapp.wisestamp.com/#>
Av Semliki N 43
Hello All,
I am working on get OpenBSC connected to a 3rd party MSC, I read from the
Osmo document that I can use the bsc only mode and the osm-bsc instead of
the osmo-nitb.
Currently I had osmo-trx-uhd, osmo-bts-trx, osmo-bsc, and osmo-stp
configured and and running, but I see a lot of below error logs in the
osmo-stp console:
```````````````````````````
DLSS7 <000c> osmo_ss7.c:1468 asp-asp-dyn-0: xua_srv_conn_cb():
sctp_recvmsg() returned 56 (flags=0x80)
DLM3UA <000f> m3ua.c:722 asp-asp-dyn-0: Received M3UA Message (XFER:DATA)
DLM3UA <000f> m3ua.c:541 asp-asp-dyn-0: m3ua_rx_xfer
DLM3UA <000f> m3ua.c:580 asp-asp-dyn-0: m3ua_rx_xfer(): M3UA data header:
opc=337=0.42.1 dpc=185=0.23.1
DLSS7 <000c> osmo_ss7_hmrt.c:278 m3ua_hmdc_rx_from_l2(): dpc=185=0.23.1 not
local, message is for routing
DLSS7 <000c> osmo_ss7_hmrt.c:258 MTP-TRANSFER.req for DPC 185: no route!
````````````````````````````
On the BSC console, I am seeing a lot of:
```````````````````````````````
<0007> a_reset.c:106 A-RESET(msc-0)[0xb76ce0]{DISC}: (re)sending BSSMAP
RESET message...
<0007> osmo_bsc_sigtran.c:93 Sending RESET to MSC:
RI=SSN_PC,PC=0.23.1,SSN=BSSAP
```````````````````````````````
Can anyone identify what is the issue here?
Appreciates!
Regards,
Weiqi
Hello.
I just followed the step by step procedure outlined in the wiki to compile
OpenBSC on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS for the ip.access nanoBTS. My problem is that
the folder ipaccess which has the ipaccess.config is missing and so is the
abisip-find file.
Any leads on why this is happening? I had seen somewhere that the above can
be found in the osmocom-ipaccess-utils from the repo but that too is
unavailable.
Many thanks
-tyrus
Hi!
I've been working on a patch for OsmoBSC which generates CTRL traps from
OML Failure Event Reports as received from BTSs. This is quite obvious,
of course we want failures generate traps, right?
The problem starts with the fact that Failure Event Reports can contain
arbitrary strings ("Additional Text IE"), and that such text of course
can contain spaces.
My current patch (https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/osmo-bsc/+/14177)
would produce TRAPs like this:
b'TRAP 0 bts.0.oml_failure_report "processing failure","failure ceased","TC_pcu_oml_alert"'
[where the b'' part is from python as I used osmo_ctrl.py to print the above]
As we never formally specified anything about the CTRL protocol apart from
using ',' as a separator between fields, this is a somewhat grey area.
What do you guys think?
Do you know of existing CTRL interface usage where spaces are present
in the 'value' part of the message?
Do you know of existing code that would break should we introduce support
for quoted strings with spaces inside the 'value' part?
Regards,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
Dear fellow Osmocom developers,
I just would like to use this as a gentle reminder that we shouldn't be
merging new features without having automatic tests for them in place.
What comes to my mind immediately right now (but I'm sure there are other
examples) is the "subscriber create on demand" feature. I couldn't find
any tests in HLR_Tests.ttcn about this feature.
What this means is, that it will *eventually* break unnoticed, particularly
until somebody is using that feature and updating frequently to master,
which is unlikely to happen. Either you run a production system and then
you don't follow master, or you're just playing around and then that
feature is probably not something you'd be using in many cases.
What actually bugs me most about it, is that the tests should have been
written first. For most of our development [1], the existing infrastructure
in terms of TTCN3 Modules is very strong, and adding related tests is
rather quick. This means it's *very* feasible to write the tests first
and then the actual code. In fact, my own experience shows that development
is much faster this way, as maual testing of the entire stack with phones
is sloooow.
This is not to complain to Oliver or any single person, but just a general
reminder to all of us. That includes first and foremost myself as I'm
merging most of the development, but is addressed to all of the developers
and reviewers: IF something doesn't have a test, but could reasonably be
tested without spending a multitude of the development time on tests, we
should mandate that tests are available at the time of merge.
We of course cannot mandate or enforce that developers write the tests first
and follow test-driven development methodology. But I would at least strongly
encourage everyone to try that. If you first spend tons of time with manual
testing and then write a test case, it's much less efficient as you spend time
for both. OTOTH, if you first invest the time into writing the test, then
the development can make very quick progress and you save a lot of time
that would otherwise be wasted with manual testing.
Regards,
Harald
[1] I'm referring to rather self-cntained, small features. For sure,
e.g. testing inter-MSC-HO requires lots of new tsting infrastructure to be
developed, as does testing of the PCU. So yes, there are exception.
--
- Harald Welte <hwelte(a)sysmocom.de> http://www.sysmocom.de/
=======================================================================
* sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH
* Alt-Moabit 93
* 10559 Berlin, Germany
* Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B
* Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Director: Harald Welte
Hi Neels,
in the following commit:
commit 89991fdb7c01fa42e323577b4026985e580763cf
Author: Neels Hofmeyr <neels(a)hofmeyr.de>
Date: Mon Jan 28 19:06:53 2019 +0100
you introduce language about restricting the timeout to a signed 32bit value,
as time_t is not well-defined on 32bit systems.
What I'm somehow missing is where we are using time_t in this context? Neither
osmo_fsm code nor the underlying osmo_timer_list seems to be using time_t.
So why would we bother about time_t here?
Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
Regards,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
Hi all!
As some of you know, I'm currently using libosmocore, and specifically
osmo_fsm inside some cortex-m microcontroller projects. One of the
features I need there: FSM timeouts below 1s.
osmo_fsm uses osmo_timer_list as underlying timer, and that timer can
express any timeval (seconds + microseconds) as timeout. Only the osmo_fsm
API doesn't expose that part.
What I could now do: Simply add osmo_fsm_inst_state_chg2 which takes one
more argument for microseconds. However, I find that "second, microsecond"
style with two arguments everywhere quite clumsy.
So what I'm instead suggesting is to add new API that use one single timeout
value (like the current API), but specify the timeout in milliseconds. The
old API then becomes a wrapper around the new API, simply multiplyin timeouts
by a factor of 1000.
Does anyone think this is too restrictive? I currently cannot think of use
cases where timeouts below one 1ms or with granularity below 1ms matter *and*
where one would want to use osmo-fsm. But given how speeds of systems (both
processors and communications systems) are increasing, it might be that we'd
eventually need that? I'd currently assume osmo_fsm with all of its internal
logging, etc. is too heavy-weight for such super-time-constrained use cases.
And in terms of value range: Assuming a 32bit architecture, the scale of
a 2^32 microsecond value is sufficient to express timeouts up to 1193
hours, which in turn is about 49 days.
Any comments, ideas, thoughts?
Regards,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
