7 Sep
2010
7 Sep
'10
10:49 a.m.
Hello Andreas,
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:57:56 +0200, "Andreas Schmidt-Dannert"
<aschmida(a)mail.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
I can only see the DNS query for the ip of the SUPL server and than some
TCP packets going to the SUPL port (7275) and back to my mobile phone.
I could just verify my assumption: The traffic is SSL encrypted. If you
tell WireShark to decode the trace as SSL you can see that the result
will make sense. So I guess that the ULP traffic is embedded in SSL.
I found a valid ULP trace here:
http://pastebin.com/6vfri6Mt
I don't know from whom it is, it is already decoded.
Best regards,
Dieter
--
Dieter Spaar, Germany spaar(a)mirider.augusta.de
7 Sep
7 Sep
3:32 p.m.
New subject: ULP [was: Problem connecting to NanoBTS with current version of OpenBSC]
Hello Dieter,
On 09/07/2010 02:49 PM, Dieter Spaar wrote:
Hello Andreas,
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:57:56 +0200, "Andreas
Schmidt-Dannert"<aschmida(a)mail.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
Okay that looks a bit different :). Thank you. It makes sense that it is
SSL encrypted and I also decoded it and you were right. I can see the
handshake now..or at least the beginning of it since it did not finish.
Anyway I hoped for something different. Probably the connection will
always be SSL encrypted no matter what SUPL server I use.
Thanks,
Andreas
I can only see the DNS query for the ip of the
SUPL server and than some
TCP packets going to the SUPL port (7275) and back to my mobile phone.
I could just verify my assumption: The traffic is SSL encrypted. If you
tell WireShark to decode the trace as SSL you can see that the result
will make sense. So I guess that the ULP traffic is embedded in SSL.
I found a valid ULP trace here:
http://pastebin.com/6vfri6Mt
5427
days inactive
5427
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Andreas Schmidt-Dannert -
Dieter Spaar