OpenBSC

openbsc@lists.osmocom.org

10 participants
4277 discussions

AW: applying multibts-patch
by Andreas.Eversberg 07 Jan '11

07 Jan '11

you don't need that patch. you can configure the hfcmulti.ko using dmask and bmask: * dmask and bmask: * NOTE: One dmask value must be given for every HFC-E1 card. * If omitted, the E1 card has D-channel on time slot 16, which is default. * dmask is a 32 bit mask. The bit must be set for an alternate time slot. * If multiple bits are set, multiple virtual card fragments are created. * For each bit set, a bmask value must be given. Each bit on the bmask * value stands for a B-channel. The bmask may not overlap with dmask or * with other bmask values for that card. * Example: dmask=0x00020002 bmask=0x0000fffc,0xfffc0000 * This will create one fragment with D-channel on slot 1 with * B-channels on slots 2..15, and a second fragment with D-channel * on slot 17 with B-channels on slot 18..31. Slot 16 is unused. * If bit 0 is set (dmask=0x00000001) the D-channel is on slot 0 and will * not function. * Example: dmask=0x00000001 bmask=0xfffffffe * This will create a port with all 31 usable timeslots as * B-channels. * If no bits are set on bmask, no B-channel is created for that fragment. * Example: dmask=0xfffffffe bmask=0,0,0,0.... (31 0-values for bmask) * This will create 31 ports with one D-channel only. * If you don't know how to use it, you don't need it! hope this helps -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: openbsc-bounces(a)lists.gnumonks.org [mailto:openbsc-bounces@lists.gnumonks.org] Im Auftrag von Thomas Ansorg Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Januar 2011 12:39 An: openBSC-Mailingliste Betreff: applying multibts-patch hello i downloaded kernelversion 2.6.30 from www.kernel.org for using the linux-2.6.30-hfcmulti-multibts.patch on it. unfortunately, some hunks in the c-file failed. where can i download a kernel that fits to that patch? T. -- Wer Rechtschreibfehler findet, darf sie behalten!

1 0

applying multibts-patch
by Thomas Ansorg 07 Jan '11

07 Jan '11

hello i downloaded kernelversion 2.6.30 from www.kernel.org for using the linux-2.6.30-hfcmulti-multibts.patch on it. unfortunately, some hunks in the c-file failed. where can i download a kernel that fits to that patch? T. -- Wer Rechtschreibfehler findet, darf sie behalten!

1 0

[ADM] OpenBSC git repository address change
by Harald Welte 07 Jan '11

07 Jan '11

Hi all! Today, I have moved the remaining projects on git://openbsc.osmocom.org/ (aka git://bs11-abis.gnumonks.org/) to the central git://git.osmocom.org/ location. This helps us to consolidate all our git repositories on one server. The git URL of the main OpenBSC repository has changed from git://bs11-abis.gnumonks.org/openbsc.git (read-only) gitosis@bs11-abis.gnumonks.org:openbsc.git (write) to git://git.osmocom.org/openbsc.git (read-only) gitosis@git.osmocom.org:openbsc.git (write) In order to update your local repository with the new URL, simply use the "git remote set-url" command, like in the following examples. for those of you with read-only access: git remote set-url origin git://git.osmocom.org/openbsc.git for people with write/commit access: git remote set-url origin gitosis@git.osmocom.org:openbsc.git The other two repositories that have changed in similar way are openggsn.git and chan_openbsc.git. Thanks for your attention, and sorry for any inconvenience, Harald -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

1 0

Wireshark Patching...
by Omar Atia 07 Jan '11

07 Jan '11

Dear All, Please note that after getting the sources using git , I found wireshark directory contains patches ? I did some googling I found that if I need to patch wireshark I should run like the below command : 1. patch -p1 < patch path/name the configure and compile , but while checking wireshark sources I didn't find for packet-gsm_abis_oml.c in the path of wireshark /epan/dissectors? does the patch abis_oml.patch(available under wireshark directory with the delivery downloaded with git) create it ? Thanks, Omar Atia

1 0

IPA Stream IDs
by Holger Hans Peter Freyther 06 Jan '11

06 Jan '11

Hi all, I was very liberal in just using numbers from the 'open' number range. We should move to a different scheme and just take the liberty to take one ID and then have our own header inside there. I would propose to do something like this struct ipa_proto_hdr { uint16_t len; uint8_t proto; data[0]; } packed; struct osmo_ipa_proto_hdr { uint8_t osmo_proto; data[0]; } packed;. Any comments?

2 2

Connecting to real MSC...
by Omar Atia 05 Jan '11

05 Jan '11

Dear All, Can you advise how I could make connections to real MSCs from Openbsc ? Is it supported by OpenBSC? I believe it is over A protocol right ? SCCP ? Thanks, Omar Atia

1 0

Re: Who has a nanoBTS for sale?
by Martin Mayoral Zuloaga 05 Jan '11

05 Jan '11

I have 2 nanobts for sale. Are you interesting

4 3

RE: Relicensing OpenBSC under AGPLv3
by mosbah abdelkader 03 Jan '11

03 Jan '11

Can you explain please why you are changing the license. thks. On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:04 PM, <openbsc-request(a)lists.gnumonks.org> wrote: > Send OpenBSC mailing list submissions to > openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.gnumonks.org/mailman/listinfo/openbsc > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > openbsc-request(a)lists.gnumonks.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > openbsc-owner(a)lists.gnumonks.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of OpenBSC digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) (Holger Hans Peter Freyther) > 2. Relicensing OpenBSC under AGPLv3 (Harald Welte) > 3. RE: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) (Omar Atia) > 4. RE: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) (Omar Atia) > 5. RE: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) (Omar Atia) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 10:57:43 +0100 > From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther <holger(a)freyther.de> > Subject: Re: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) > To: Omar Atia <omar.atia(a)its.ws> > Cc: openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org > Message-ID: <4D1EFA97.2010208(a)freyther.de> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On 01/01/2011 10:28 AM, Omar Atia wrote: > > Dear Holger, > > > > I will try to make it on Linux (Home PC), but for the time being solaries > is the OS available for me . > > > > Sorry, > > you really need to find Solaris support in some other channel (no idea > where > this should be). > > z. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 18:19:01 +0100 > From: Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> > Subject: Relicensing OpenBSC under AGPLv3 > To: openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org > Message-ID: <20110101171901.GM23146(a)prithivi.gnumonks.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Hi all, > > Following-up to the previous discussion in May 2009, I have finally changed > the > OpenBSC (and related software) license from GPLv2-or-later to > AGPLv3-or-later. > > All copyright holders have been contacted and all agree on the change of > the > license. > > libosmocore will remain GPLv2-or-later, and if linked with OpenBSC, you > will > use the AGPLv3 compatible GPLv3 license. > > Regards, > Harald > -- > - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> > http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ > > ============================================================================ > "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." > (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6) > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 11:28:47 +0200 > From: Omar Atia <omar.atia(a)its.ws> > Subject: RE: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) > To: 'Holger Hans Peter Freyther' <holger(a)freyther.de>, > openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org > Message-ID: <000201cba996$4d6a9410$e83fbc30$%atia(a)its.ws> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Dear Holger, > > I will try to make it on Linux (Home PC), but for the time being solaries > is the OS available for me . > > 2nd I have found success in compiling sqlite3 and created 3 libs file and > put them under > > root@ITSHPS # cd /usr/lib/dbd or /usr/local/lib/dbd > root@ITSHPS # ls -ltr > total 56 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 31520 Jan 1 11:15 libdbdsqlite3 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 942 Jan 1 11:15 libdbdsqlite3.la > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 24532 Jan 1 11:15 libdbdsqlite3.a > > Is it necessary to have the shared library as driver I mean is it > obligatory to have libdbdsqlite3.a and libdbdsqlite3.so ? > > Kindly check that folder under your linux path and let me know because I'm > still getting same message when running bsc_hack. > > [ITSHPS]celtabs:/oradata/u01/celtabs/openbsc/openbsc/openbsc/src>./bsc_hack > -c openbsc.cfg.nanobts > <0012> db.c:192 Failed to create connection. > DB: Failed to init database. Please check the option settings. > > > > Please check the below link it contains the so file ... > > http://packages.debian.org/lenny/sparc/libdbd-sqlite3/filelist > > > Thanks,, > Omar Atia > > -----Original Message----- > From: openbsc-bounces(a)lists.gnumonks.org [mailto: > openbsc-bounces(a)lists.gnumonks.org] On Behalf Of Holger Hans Peter > Freyther > Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 12:39 AM > To: openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org > Subject: Re: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) > > On 12/31/2010 11:32 PM, Omar Atia wrote: > > Dear holger, > > > > > so now I have framework installed and I have the sources for the > libdbdsqlite3 but I'm not able to compile , it is writing make statements > without compiling ... > > > > search for *** in the output. it is an indication of (GNU) make that there > is > an error. Most likely the configure script told you it couldn't find the > sqlite3.h and that the SQLIte3 backend was disabled or you need to pass > --enable-sqlite3 when configuring the drivers. > > Is there a strong reason to use Solaris? If there is not strong reason to > use > it you might be more happy with a Linux System as it comes with an easy way > to > install all these dependencies. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 11:56:43 +0200 > From: Omar Atia <omar.atia(a)its.ws> > Subject: RE: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) > To: 'Holger Hans Peter Freyther' <holger(a)freyther.de> > Cc: openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org > Message-ID: <000301cba99a$349615a0$9dc240e0$%atia(a)its.ws> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > It works dear , shared library was missing during compilation :) ...sorry > > -----Original Message----- > From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther [mailto:holger@freyther.de] > Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 11:58 AM > To: Omar Atia > Cc: openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org > Subject: Re: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) > > On 01/01/2011 10:28 AM, Omar Atia wrote: > > Dear Holger, > > > > I will try to make it on Linux (Home PC), but for the time being solaries > is the OS available for me . > > > > Sorry, > > you really need to find Solaris support in some other channel (no idea > where > this should be). > > z. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 00:01:41 +0200 > From: Omar Atia <omar.atia(a)its.ws> > Subject: RE: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) > To: 'Omar Atia' <omar.atia(a)its.ws>, 'Holger Hans Peter Freyther' > <holger(a)freyther.de> > Cc: openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org > Message-ID: <000701cba9ff$7ac0c740$704255c0$%atia(a)its.ws> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Dear Holger? > > > > Also attached screen shot for the telnet to bsc_hack as well as running the > program for sure I still have to bring ipaccess nanoBTS: > > > > Do you have documentation for sample vty commands ? how to provisin > subscriber ? bulk provisining for example ? or needs a script to write them > to DB in bulk mode ? another question is can we use oracle or we need to > redesign the application (db.c) , I saw some commented line for mysql ? > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Omar Atia [mailto:omar.atia@its.ws] > Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 11:57 AM > To: 'Holger Hans Peter Freyther' > Cc: 'openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org' > Subject: RE: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) > > > > It works dear , shared library was missing during compilation :) ...sorry > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther [mailto:holger@freyther.de] > > Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 11:58 AM > > To: Omar Atia > > Cc: openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org > > Subject: Re: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) > > > > On 01/01/2011 10:28 AM, Omar Atia wrote: > > > Dear Holger, > > > > > > I will try to make it on Linux (Home PC), but for the time being solaries > is the OS available for me . > > > > > > > Sorry, > > > > you really need to find Solaris support in some other channel (no idea > where > > this should be). > > > > z. > >

3 2

RFC: Relicensing OpenBSC under AGPLv3
by Harald Welte 02 Jan '11

02 Jan '11

Hi all! This subject came to my attention again recently: Why not relicense OpenBSC under AGPLv3? Right now we are licensing under GPLv2+ (v2 or any later version). However, if an operator was to make lots of private modifications and then operate it on his own network, there would be no distribution and thus no need for him to release his modified versions of the source code. This may sound a bit strange to those who have been with the project since its early days. But we are reaching production quality now, and we already have the first number of production deployments of the software. Companies like Netzing and On-waves have been FOSS-friendly and funding parts of our development effort. They have no issues with the result being Free Software again. However, there are definitely other companies out there who are less fond of sharing... So thus my idea is to put OpenBSC under AGPLv3. This way whoever uses OpenBSC _in modified form_ to operate a communications network will have to provide the source code to that modified form on a network server at no charge. The only controversial question to me is "your modified version must prominently offer all users interacting with it remotely through a computer network (if your version supports such interaction) an opportunity to receive the Corresponding Source". 1) does a gsm network count as computer network? i'd say yes. 2) is using a gsm network 'interacting with it remotely'? I'd also say yes 3) what does 'prominently offer' mean in the context of GSM? We don't want the operator to spam their users with advertisement SMS just to know that they can get the soruce code, after all. Notwithstanding those open questions, such a network operator would always have the option of simply sending back his changes for integration in the official project - and thus he would no longer use a modified version which then means there is no need for the prominent notice / download at all. We can make this very clear in the project documentation, putting further encouragement The actual relicensing should be less problematic than I thought, since AGPLv3 is compatible with GPLv3. So I could re-license all parts that I own copyright on (which should be the majority of the code base anyway) under AGPLv3, while the former GPLv2+ components (like VTY code from zebra, or contributions by other people) then become GPLv3-or-later. Of course I would want to encourage all developers/contributors to also follow the re-licensing. Particularly Holger Freyther, Dieter Spaar, Andreas Eversberg, Jan Luebbe, Sylvain Munaut, Daniel Willmann, Stefan Schmidt. So let's start with a poll: a) Do you think re-licensing to AGPLv3 is a good idea? b) If you have contributed, would you re-license your code under AGPLv3? If we have some kind of concesus in the community, I would approach On-waves whether they would want to do the same for their share of the copyright. As their "modifications" are all part of OpenBSC git repository, they would not be subject to any different conditions than before. Thanks in advance for your feedback, Harald -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

3 5

Re: OpenBSC on Solaris (WAS: Re: Notes from the 27C3 network)
by Dieter Spaar 31 Dec '10

31 Dec '10

Hello Holger, On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:24:41 +0100, "Holger Hans Peter Freyther" <holger(a)freyther.de> wrote: > > If that is set on the socket for the telnet interface it does make a difference. Just in case, Cygwin also misses cfmakeraw(), my private modification for this is the following which is of course the same you quoted from the man page. #if defined(__CYGWIN__) /* Workaround for Cygwin, which is missing cfmakeraw */ /* Pasted from man page */ void cfmakeraw(struct termios *termios_p) { termios_p->c_iflag &= ~(IGNBRK|BRKINT|PARMRK|ISTRIP|INLCR|IGNCR|ICRNL|IXON); termios_p->c_oflag &= ~OPOST; termios_p->c_lflag &= ~(ECHO|ECHONL|ICANON|ISIG|IEXTEN); termios_p->c_cflag &= ~(CSIZE|PARENB); termios_p->c_cflag |= CS8; } #endif /* defined(__CYGWIN__) */ Maybe there is a Solaris-specific preprocessor symbol and we can add this function to an appropriate place. Best regards, Dieter -- Dieter Spaar, Germany spaar(a)mirider.augusta.de

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

OpenBSC