OpenBSC May 2016

openbsc@lists.osmocom.org

25 participants
165 discussions

by Martin Nagy

Hi all, After buying a super Sim Kit (16 in 1) from China, I tried the reader (green PCB inside a blue transparent plastic case with a blue LED) and SIM (identified as a fakesupersim) with pysim tool. However i am getting the following error: /pySim-prog.py -n 26C3 -c 49 -x 262 -y 42 -z 1234 -j 1 -t auto Insert card now (or CTRL-C to cancel) Autodetected card type fakemagicsim Generated card parameters : > Name : 26C3 > SMSP : e1ffffffffffffffffffffffff058100945555ffffffffffff000000 > ICCID : 8949262427518313026 > MCC/MNC : 262/42 > IMSI : 262422461512085 > Ki : 7b74741a1ee14337ec23f9ab92a13648 > OPC : ccd867d60797d8d45354a51b3ef568ff Programming ... Traceback (most recent call last): File "./pySim-prog.py", line 530, in <module> card.program(cp) File "/home/nadicek/pysim/pysim/pySim/cards.py", line 231, in program self._scc.update_binary('6f30', hplmn + 'ff' * (tl-3)) File "/home/nadicek/pysim/pysim/pySim/commands.py", line 53, in update_binary return self._tp.send_apdu_checksw(pdu) File "/home/nadicek/pysim/pysim/pySim/transport/__init__.py", line 87, in send_apdu_checksw raise RuntimeError("SW match failed ! Expected %s and got %s." % (sw.lower(), rv[1])) RuntimeError: SW match failed ! Expected 9000 and got 9804. I checked mailing lists and haven’t found anybody who had similar problem with pysim. Also I have tried forcing different models of SIM, but nothing is working. Obviously I can remove this check from the script file (__init__.py in /pySim/transport), however somebody had a reason to put such condition there. I would like to ask if it is safe to remove that line of code and the purpose of that line of code. Thanks a lot and best regards Martin

1 month, 4 weeks

Re: Help with sccp library

by mosbah abdelkader

> I don't understand. This callback will be called with data you need to write > to the network. In case of MTP Level3 you will need to wrap that around the > msgb you got. I means: is the interaction with mtp3 layer implemented (is sending sccp data by mtp3 implemented by the library?)? Also, what about the reception of data from mtp3 layer. is that implemented in the sccp lib. I am asking these questions because I see the code of mtp3 in the lib but no significant call is present in the sccp part of the lib. Thank you for your help.

3 months, 1 week

Moving from trac to a single redmine

by Holger Freyther

Hi guys, I think some of us would like to move to redmine and start using public tickets more frequently. So in case we move there are some topics to be discussed and I would like to start with a couple of them right now. Tickets: Redmine has a global linear sequence of ticket numbers. If we move from many tracs to a single redmine we can either: * not import tickets * only import from one project * deal with changing ticket numbers In terms of installations the GMR trac is broken in regard to tickets, there are some for SDR that are probably not being fixed anytime soon, baseband might be relevant and OpenBSC is unlikely to be relevant. I don't think we have ever used ticket reference in OpenBSC commit messages so in terms of OpenBSC having changing ticket numbers would not be a big deal. E.g. we could add a custom field with the old trac number? Wiki: We have external references that should be redirected to the new place. Is there any way besides maintaining a list in the apache2/nginx configuration and making redirects as we find broken references? Can we proactively manage this? Is anybody willing to come up with a script and nginx configuration for doing this? kind regards holger

9 years

osmo-bts-trx: "CHAN RQD: no resources for SDCCH" on master

by Tom Tsou

Hi Harald, On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> wrote: > Can you or somebody else interested in getting this resolved provide a > full bug report, including > * debug log output on OsmoNITB side for for the rsl and nm > * debug log output on OsmoBTS side for oml / transceiver interface or > anything else related > * pcap file of A-bis traffic between OsmoBTS and OsmoNITB, as well as > the control commands between osmo-bts-trx and osmo-trx Attached are the logs for master branches of OpenBSC, OsmoBTS, and OsmoTRX leading up to the following RACH access behavior. <0004> abis_rsl.c:1423 BTS 0 CHAN RQD: no resources for SDCCH 0x2 Hopefully, somebody more familiar than myself with A-bis and related L1/L2 dependencies can provide some insight on why the above is happening or where to start debugging. I'll be happy to test any subsequent changes or look into specific parts of the A-bis code. -TT

9 years, 3 months

RE: Regression in osmo-pcu with UHD trx ?

by Saurabh Sharan

> Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 18:02:28 +0200 > From: Pierre Baudry <pierre.baudry(a)diateam.net> > I noticed that since several weeks that osmo-pcu did not work as good as > previously. Yes we have also seen similar failures for GPRS calls in the osmo-pcu. Our setup uses NuRAN hardware with osmo-bts-sysmo > The latest "good" revision I am aware of is commit > d87e1d6ab747423d3668c74d16201a5d967accf0 (2015/12/14) This is a useful information for us that the above mentioned commit works for GPRS. > Can somebody confirm or reproduce this attitude ? The PCU log that we have during failure matches with the one you have reported. We have tried a workaround for this GPRS call failure by forcing two-phase-access in osmo-pcu.cfg. Based on our analysis done till now it seems One phase access of GPRS is broken. > I will try to provide more logs and a pcap capture as soon as I get > hands back on the hardware. It will be quite useful to narrow down the issue, so please share the relevant logs collected Regards Saurabh

9 years, 3 months

Gerrit mails, from address, verbosity, etc

by Holger Freyther

Hi, we have the first round of contributions through Gerrit and maybe now is a good time to look at the mail setup. My goal was to: * Have diff's/patches be sent to the MailingList to see what is going on * Have comments be sent to the MailingList to have people learn from feedback In terms of technology Gerrit offers us the following notifications[1] new_changes Somebody created a new change new_patchsets Somebody updated/added a patch(set) to a change all_comments Somebody but jenkins commented submitted_changes Somebody has pushed the submit button and it is in abandoned_changes Somebody gave up on the change all Everything Currently we are using "all" and maybe we want to limit it to "new_patchsets" and "all_comments". "all_comments" is a bit troublesome as it includes empty messages like "+2" with actual review comments. What would be the close to ideal solution? * Be able to reply by mail to changes (most likely not to come) * Mails sent have the author name as From (but gerrit mail address)? * Empty mails like "+2" not sent to the Mailinglist? * Subject changed? [PATCH] and omit branch name? Or omit project name? Other proposals? Move it to a new mailinglist and leave OpenBSC as low-volume mailinglist? comments? feedback? ideas? holger [1] https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-notify.html#notif…

9 years, 4 months

gerrit: refs/users vs. refs/heads/users

by Neels Hofmeyr

Hi all, I have just changed the access configuration of gerrit.osmocom.org: * added a group of "known users" * allow create+push to refs/heads/users/* to this group * disallow access to refs/users/* (except to admins for cleanup) * added a sysmocom group * allow create+push to refs/heads/sysmocom/* to this group Questions: * allow global namespace access to "known users"? * or move old user branches to users/? Causality: Previously, gerrit granted create+push access to refs/users/* (note: no "heads") to anybody. However, branches pushed there were not being replicated to git.osmocom.org. IMHO we should not have this fragmentation of repositories. Instead, we could allow create+push to refs/heads/users/* (note: "heads") to any registered user. The refs/heads/users/* namespace will replicate to git.osmocom.org repositories automatically. But: Before gerrit, anyone would be able to push to any branch. We relied on trust that we wouldn't mess with other devs' branches or push to master without review. That worked out pretty well. But, before gerrit, we would actively enable users we trust. With gerrit, ANYONE can register without any project member even noticing, and start pushing right away. Thus we should rather limit the push access, e.g. to refs/heads/users/* When granting push access to the users/* namespace to ANYONE, one problem remains: any troll could commit any amount of completely unrelated data, and we would readily replicate it to our "upstream" git.osmocom.org repositories. So, actually, instead of allowing push access to users/* to anyone, I have added a group "known users" to gerrit, which should typically contain anyone we trust not to be a troll. I have added all gerrit users I know to this group. Anyone who wishes to push to a users/* branch must request to be added to the "known users" group. The threshold to join this group should be low. (The ability to push patches for review is not affected.) Since certain subgroups like to collaborate on given branches (e.g. fairwaves, sysmocom, ...), we can add specific namespaces for these groups. I have so far added a refs/heads/sysmocom/* namespace and a "sysmocom group access" gerrit group. I can add more groups on request. The only advantage here is that you can drop the "users/" path element. Any "known users" member can collaborate on users/* branches already, e.g. refs/heads/users/sysmocom/topic. To make this less config prone, we could go one step further and allow global push access to the group of known users, going back to the model of trust that users take care not to push nonsense. That would include access to master. We also still have various branches in git.osmocom.org that don't have the 'users' path element. If we grant global namespace access to known users, these would continue to be useful. If not, we could rename these to users/ to allow further access. Opinions welcome! ~Neels -- - Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> http://www.sysmocom.de/ ======================================================================= * sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH * Alt-Moabit 93 * 10559 Berlin, Germany * Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B * Geschäftsführer / Managing Directors: Holger Freyther, Harald Welte

9 years, 4 months

[PATCH] openbsc[master]: Add regexp authorization policy for IMSI

by Max

Review at https://gerrit.osmocom.org/104 Add regexp authorization policy for IMSI * extend "auth policy" vty command with new option "regexp" * add vty command "authorized-regexp" for setting arbitrary POSIX regular expression * add basic vty test * add optional "regexp" argument to subscriber-create-on-demand vty command With those in place we can now set the regexp against which MS's IMSI will be matched. If IMSI match the regexp than MS is allowed to access the network. If subscriber is already marked as authorized in HLR than it'll be allowed regardless of IMSI matching. The same way we can decide whether to create subscribers on-demand basesd on IMSI regexp match. Similar to authorization this restriction can be overridden by manually creating subscriber via vty, ctrl interface or directly in HLR. Change-Id: I525f4b80676de47d1d422686da2ca012301b0129 Fixes: OS#1647 --- M openbsc/include/openbsc/gsm_data.h M openbsc/src/libbsc/bsc_vty.c M openbsc/src/libbsc/net_init.c M openbsc/src/libcommon/gsm_data.c M openbsc/src/libmsc/gsm_04_08.c M openbsc/src/libmsc/vty_interface_layer3.c M openbsc/tests/vty_test_runner.py 7 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/openbsc refs/changes/04/104/1 diff --git a/openbsc/include/openbsc/gsm_data.h b/openbsc/include/openbsc/gsm_data.h index a08938c..31a4ed5 100644 --- a/openbsc/include/openbsc/gsm_data.h +++ b/openbsc/include/openbsc/gsm_data.h @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ #define _GSM_DATA_H #include <stdint.h> +#include <regex.h> +#include <sys/types.h> #include <osmocom/core/timer.h> #include <osmocom/core/select.h> @@ -22,6 +24,7 @@ enum gsm_subscr_creation_mode { GSM_SUBSCR_DONT_CREATE = 0, GSM_SUBSCR_CREAT_W_RAND_EXT = 1, + GSM_SUBSCR_CREAT_W_REGEXP = 2, }; enum gsm_security_event { @@ -205,6 +208,7 @@ GSM_AUTH_POLICY_CLOSED, /* only subscribers authorized in DB */ GSM_AUTH_POLICY_ACCEPT_ALL, /* accept everyone, even if not authorized in DB */ GSM_AUTH_POLICY_TOKEN, /* accept first, send token per sms, then revoke authorization */ + GSM_AUTH_POLICY_REGEXP, /* accept IMSIs matching given regexp */ }; #define GSM_T3101_DEFAULT 10 @@ -219,6 +223,8 @@ char *name_long; char *name_short; enum gsm_auth_policy auth_policy; + regex_t authorized_regexp; + char *authorized_reg_str; enum gsm48_reject_value reject_cause; int a5_encryption; int neci; diff --git a/openbsc/src/libbsc/bsc_vty.c b/openbsc/src/libbsc/bsc_vty.c index 46ad457..66c9107 100644 --- a/openbsc/src/libbsc/bsc_vty.c +++ b/openbsc/src/libbsc/bsc_vty.c @@ -190,8 +190,11 @@ net->name_long, VTY_NEWLINE); vty_out(vty, " Short network name: '%s'%s", net->name_short, VTY_NEWLINE); - vty_out(vty, " Authentication policy: %s%s", - gsm_auth_policy_name(net->auth_policy), VTY_NEWLINE); + vty_out(vty, " Authentication policy: %s", + gsm_auth_policy_name(net->auth_policy)); + if (net->authorized_reg_str) + vty_out(vty, ", authorized regexp: %s", net->authorized_reg_str); + vty_out(vty, "%s", VTY_NEWLINE); vty_out(vty, " Location updating reject cause: %u%s", net->reject_cause, VTY_NEWLINE); vty_out(vty, " Encryption: A5/%u%s", net->a5_encryption, @@ -791,6 +794,8 @@ vty_out(vty, " short name %s%s", gsmnet->name_short, VTY_NEWLINE); vty_out(vty, " long name %s%s", gsmnet->name_long, VTY_NEWLINE); vty_out(vty, " auth policy %s%s", gsm_auth_policy_name(gsmnet->auth_policy), VTY_NEWLINE); + if (gsmnet->authorized_reg_str) + vty_out(vty, " authorized-regexp %s%s", gsmnet->authorized_reg_str, VTY_NEWLINE); vty_out(vty, " location updating reject cause %u%s", gsmnet->reject_cause, VTY_NEWLINE); vty_out(vty, " encryption a5 %u%s", gsmnet->a5_encryption, VTY_NEWLINE); @@ -1398,17 +1403,34 @@ DEFUN(cfg_net_auth_policy, cfg_net_auth_policy_cmd, - "auth policy (closed|accept-all|token)", + "auth policy (closed|accept-all|regexp|token)", "Authentication (not cryptographic)\n" "Set the GSM network authentication policy\n" "Require the MS to be activated in HLR\n" "Accept all MS, whether in HLR or not\n" + "Use regular expression for IMSI authorization decision\n" "Use SMS-token based authentication\n") { enum gsm_auth_policy policy = gsm_auth_policy_parse(argv[0]); struct gsm_network *gsmnet = gsmnet_from_vty(vty); gsmnet->auth_policy = policy; + + return CMD_SUCCESS; +} + +DEFUN(cfg_net_authorize_regexp, cfg_net_authorize_regexp_cmd, + "authorized-regexp REGEXP", + "Set regexp for IMSI which will be used for authorization decision\n" + "Regular expression, IMSIs matching it are allowed to use the network\n") +{ + struct gsm_network *gsmnet = gsmnet_from_vty(vty); + if (gsm_parse_reg(gsmnet, &gsmnet->authorized_regexp, + &gsmnet->authorized_reg_str, argc, argv) != 0) { + vty_out(vty, "%%Failed to parse the authorized-regexp: '%s'%s", + argv[0], VTY_NEWLINE); + return CMD_WARNING; + } return CMD_SUCCESS; } @@ -3973,6 +3995,7 @@ install_element(GSMNET_NODE, &cfg_net_name_short_cmd); install_element(GSMNET_NODE, &cfg_net_name_long_cmd); install_element(GSMNET_NODE, &cfg_net_auth_policy_cmd); + install_element(GSMNET_NODE, &cfg_net_authorize_regexp_cmd); install_element(GSMNET_NODE, &cfg_net_reject_cause_cmd); install_element(GSMNET_NODE, &cfg_net_encryption_cmd); install_element(GSMNET_NODE, &cfg_net_neci_cmd); diff --git a/openbsc/src/libbsc/net_init.c b/openbsc/src/libbsc/net_init.c index afcaaf3..caf134a 100644 --- a/openbsc/src/libbsc/net_init.c +++ b/openbsc/src/libbsc/net_init.c @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ net->subscr_group->net = net; net->subscr_creation_mode = GSM_SUBSCR_CREAT_W_RAND_EXT; - + net->authorized_reg_str = NULL; net->country_code = country_code; net->network_code = network_code; net->num_bts = 0; diff --git a/openbsc/src/libcommon/gsm_data.c b/openbsc/src/libcommon/gsm_data.c index 4e235fd..9d794ee 100644 --- a/openbsc/src/libcommon/gsm_data.c +++ b/openbsc/src/libcommon/gsm_data.c @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ { GSM_AUTH_POLICY_CLOSED, "closed" }, { GSM_AUTH_POLICY_ACCEPT_ALL, "accept-all" }, { GSM_AUTH_POLICY_TOKEN, "token" }, + { GSM_AUTH_POLICY_REGEXP, "regexp" }, { 0, NULL } }; diff --git a/openbsc/src/libmsc/gsm_04_08.c b/openbsc/src/libmsc/gsm_04_08.c index 74da34b..1f948b2 100644 --- a/openbsc/src/libmsc/gsm_04_08.c +++ b/openbsc/src/libmsc/gsm_04_08.c @@ -25,9 +25,12 @@ #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> +#include <stdbool.h> #include <errno.h> #include <time.h> #include <netinet/in.h> +#include <regex.h> +#include <sys/types.h> #include "bscconfig.h" @@ -244,6 +247,17 @@ return -EINVAL; /* not reached */ } +static bool subscr_regexp_check(const struct gsm_network *net, const char *imsi) +{ + if (!net->authorized_reg_str) + return false; + + if (regexec(&net->authorized_regexp, imsi, 0, NULL, 0) != REG_NOMATCH) + return true; + + return false; +} + static int authorize_subscriber(struct gsm_loc_updating_operation *loc, struct gsm_subscriber *subscriber) { @@ -261,6 +275,11 @@ switch (subscriber->group->net->auth_policy) { case GSM_AUTH_POLICY_CLOSED: return subscriber->authorized; + case GSM_AUTH_POLICY_REGEXP: + if (subscriber->authorized) + return 1; + return subscr_regexp_check(subscriber->group->net, + subscriber->imsi); case GSM_AUTH_POLICY_TOKEN: if (subscriber->authorized) return subscriber->authorized; @@ -509,10 +528,14 @@ static struct gsm_subscriber *subscr_create(const struct gsm_network *net, const char *imsi) { - if (net->subscr_creation_mode != GSM_SUBSCR_DONT_CREATE) - return subscr_create_subscriber(net->subscr_group, imsi); + if (net->subscr_creation_mode == GSM_SUBSCR_DONT_CREATE) + return NULL; - return NULL; + if (net->subscr_creation_mode & GSM_SUBSCR_CREAT_W_REGEXP) + if (!subscr_regexp_check(net, imsi)) + return NULL; + + return subscr_create_subscriber(net->subscr_group, imsi); } /* Parse Chapter 9.2.11 Identity Response */ diff --git a/openbsc/src/libmsc/vty_interface_layer3.c b/openbsc/src/libmsc/vty_interface_layer3.c index 5d74e04..3f67b9a 100644 --- a/openbsc/src/libmsc/vty_interface_layer3.c +++ b/openbsc/src/libmsc/vty_interface_layer3.c @@ -1032,11 +1032,15 @@ } DEFUN(cfg_nitb_subscr_create, cfg_nitb_subscr_create_cmd, - "subscriber-create-on-demand", - "Make a new record when a subscriber is first seen.\n") + "subscriber-create-on-demand [regexp]", + "Make a new record when a subscriber is first seen.\n" + "Create subscribers only if IMSI matches the regexp specified in " + "authorized-regexp command\n") { struct gsm_network *gsmnet = gsmnet_from_vty(vty); gsmnet->subscr_creation_mode = GSM_SUBSCR_CREAT_W_RAND_EXT; + if (argc) + gsmnet->subscr_creation_mode |= GSM_SUBSCR_CREAT_W_REGEXP; return CMD_SUCCESS; } @@ -1070,9 +1074,12 @@ static int config_write_nitb(struct vty *vty) { struct gsm_network *gsmnet = gsmnet_from_vty(vty); + enum gsm_subscr_creation_mode scm = gsmnet->subscr_creation_mode; + const char *reg = (scm & GSM_SUBSCR_CREAT_W_REGEXP) ? " regexp" : "", + *pref = scm ? "" : "no "; vty_out(vty, "nitb%s", VTY_NEWLINE); - vty_out(vty, " %ssubscriber-create-on-demand%s", - gsmnet->subscr_creation_mode ? "" : "no ", VTY_NEWLINE); + vty_out(vty, " %ssubscriber-create-on-demand%s%s", + pref, reg, VTY_NEWLINE); vty_out(vty, " %sassign-tmsi%s", gsmnet->avoid_tmsi ? "no " : "", VTY_NEWLINE); return CMD_SUCCESS; diff --git a/openbsc/tests/vty_test_runner.py b/openbsc/tests/vty_test_runner.py index c088855..c264328 100644 --- a/openbsc/tests/vty_test_runner.py +++ b/openbsc/tests/vty_test_runner.py @@ -231,6 +231,22 @@ self.assertEquals(self.vty.node(), 'config-mncc-int') + def testVtyAuthorization(self): + self.vty.enable() + self.vty.command("configure terminal") + self.vty.command("network") + self.assertTrue(self.vty.verify("auth policy closed", [''])) + self.assertTrue(self.vty.verify("auth policy regexp", [''])) + self.assertTrue(self.vty.verify("authorized-regexp ^001", [''])) + self.assertTrue(self.vty.verify("authorized-regexp 02$", [''])) + self.assertTrue(self.vty.verify("authorized-regexp *123.*", [''])) + self.vty.command("end") + self.vty.command("configure terminal") + self.vty.command("nitb") + self.assertTrue(self.vty.verify("subscriber-create-on-demand", [''])) + self.assertTrue(self.vty.verify("subscriber-create-on-demand regexp", [''])) + self.vty.command("end") + def testSi2Q(self): self.vty.enable() self.vty.command("configure terminal") -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/104 To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-MessageType: newchange Gerrit-Change-Id: I525f4b80676de47d1d422686da2ca012301b0129 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Project: openbsc Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Max <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de>

9 years, 4 months

Regression in osmo-pcu with UHD trx ?

by Pierre Baudry

Hi all, I have a Osmocom setup running with a Ettus B200 I noticed that since several weeks that osmo-pcu did not work as good as previously. The latest "good" revision I am aware of is commit d87e1d6ab747423d3668c74d16201a5d967accf0 (2015/12/14) I tried again today with commit 2fcfc29020c81891d7888ddc7ddbcd866bcd406d (2016/05/24) and not a single handset could establish data communication Reading osmo-pcu logs show that T6169 timeouts during TBF assignment : > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> bts.cpp:479 MS requests UL TBF on RACH, so we provide one: > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> tbf.cpp:672 ********** TBF starts here ********** > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> tbf.cpp:674 Allocating UL TBF: MS_CLASS=0/0 > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> gprs_ms.cpp:114 Creating MS object, TLLI = 0x00000000 > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> bts.cpp:407 Searching for first unallocated TFI: TRX=0 > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> bts.cpp:417 Found TFI=0. > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> gprs_rlcmac_ts_alloc.cpp:525 Slot Allocation (Algorithm B) for unknown class (assuming 12) > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> gprs_rlcmac_ts_alloc.cpp:560 - Rx=4 Tx=4 Sum Rx+Tx=5 Tta=2 Ttb=1 Tra=2 Trb=1 Type=1 > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> gprs_rlcmac_ts_alloc.cpp:157 - Skipping TS 0, because not enabled > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> gprs_rlcmac_ts_alloc.cpp:579 - Possible DL/UL slots: (TS=0)".CCCCCCC"(TS=7) > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> gprs_rlcmac_ts_alloc.cpp:940 - Selected UL slots: (TS=0)"...U...."(TS=7), single > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> gprs_rlcmac_ts_alloc.cpp:966 Using single slot at TS 3 for UL > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> gprs_rlcmac_ts_alloc.cpp:990 - Reserved DL/UL slots: (TS=0)"...C...."(TS=7) > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> gprs_rlcmac_ts_alloc.cpp:1017 - Assigning UL TS 3 > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> bts.cpp:1481 PDCH(TS 3, TRX 0): Attaching TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=UL STATE=NULL), 1 TBFs, USFs = 01, TFIs = 00000001. > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> tbf.cpp:385 - Setting Control TS 3 > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> gprs_ms.cpp:267 Attaching TBF to MS object, TLLI = 0x00000000, TBF = TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=UL STATE=NULL) > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> tbf.cpp:625 Allocated TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=UL STATE=NULL): trx = 0, ul_slots = 08, dl_slots = 00 > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> ./tbf.h:291 TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=UL STATE=NULL) changes state from NULL to FLOW > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> tbf.cpp:409 TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=UL STATE=FLOW) starting timer 3169. > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> bts.cpp:523 TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=UL STATE=FLOW) [UPLINK] START > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> bts.cpp:527 TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=UL STATE=FLOW) RX: [PCU <- BTS] RACH qbit-ta=0 ra=0x7b, Fn=1607859 (28,33,19) > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> bts.cpp:529 TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=UL STATE=FLOW) TX: START Immediate Assignment Uplink (AGCH) > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> bts.cpp:542 - TRX=0 (128) TS=3 TA=0 TSC=3 TFI=0 USF=0 > Fri May 27 15:51:38 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> ./tbf.h:291 TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=UL STATE=FLOW) changes state from FLOW to WAIT ASSIGN > Fri May 27 15:51:43 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> tbf.cpp:819 TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=UL STATE=WAIT ASSIGN) timer 3169 expired. > Fri May 27 15:51:43 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> tbf.cpp:874 TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=UL STATE=WAIT ASSIGN) T3169 timeout during transsmission > Fri May 27 15:51:43 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> tbf.cpp:893 - Assignment was on CCCH > Fri May 27 15:51:43 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> tbf.cpp:899 - No uplink data received yet > Fri May 27 15:51:43 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> tbf.cpp:879 TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=UL STATE=WAIT ASSIGN) will be freed due to timeout > Fri May 27 15:51:43 2016 DRLCMAC <0002> tbf.cpp:334 TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=UL STATE=WAIT ASSIGN) free Every element of the stack is running with today's revision on master (cheers for making it happen without specific branches by the way). With the same setup with osmo-pcu@d87e1d6ab747423d3668c74d16201a5d967accf0, I get solid data rates around 40 Kbits/s. I haven't seen anybody on the mailing list experiencing the same behavior, making me believe that it could be specific to osmo-bts-trx / osmo-trx users. Can somebody confirm or reproduce this attitude ? I will try to provide more logs and a pcap capture as soon as I get hands back on the hardware.

9 years, 4 months

[PATCH] openbsc[master]: rename enum gprs_mm_state to gprs_gmm_state

by Neels Hofmeyr

Review at https://gerrit.osmocom.org/157 rename enum gprs_mm_state to gprs_gmm_state Change-Id: Ibba054d15c55c7ac570e64ff66ea57964be095e3 --- M openbsc/include/openbsc/gprs_sgsn.h 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/openbsc refs/changes/57/157/1 diff --git a/openbsc/include/openbsc/gprs_sgsn.h b/openbsc/include/openbsc/gprs_sgsn.h index 898b7a5..5fbbf28 100644 --- a/openbsc/include/openbsc/gprs_sgsn.h +++ b/openbsc/include/openbsc/gprs_sgsn.h @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ enum gsm48_gsm_cause; /* TS 04.08 4.1.3.3 GMM mobility management states on the network side */ -enum gprs_mm_state { +enum gprs_gmm_state { GMM_DEREGISTERED, /* 4.1.3.3.1.1 */ GMM_COMMON_PROC_INIT, /* 4.1.3.3.1.2 */ GMM_REGISTERED_NORMAL, /* 4.1.3.3.2.1 */ @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ struct llist_head list; char imsi[GSM23003_IMSI_MAX_DIGITS+1]; - enum gprs_mm_state mm_state; + enum gprs_gmm_state mm_state; uint32_t p_tmsi; uint32_t p_tmsi_old; /* old P-TMSI before new is confirmed */ uint32_t p_tmsi_sig; -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/157 To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-MessageType: newchange Gerrit-Change-Id: Ibba054d15c55c7ac570e64ff66ea57964be095e3 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Project: openbsc Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>

9 years, 4 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

OpenBSC May 2016