> I don't understand. This callback will be called with data you need to
write
> to the network. In case of MTP Level3 you will need to wrap that around
the
> msgb you got.
I means: is the interaction with mtp3 layer implemented (is sending sccp
data by mtp3 implemented by the library?)?
Also, what about the reception of data from mtp3 layer. is that implemented
in the sccp lib.
I am asking these questions because I see the code of mtp3 in the lib but no
significant call is present in the sccp part of the lib.
Thank you for your help.
Hi all,
This patch set adds to libosmocore an optimized Viterbi decodeer for
architecture specific (Intel SSE) and non-specific cases. The
implementation covers codes with constraint lengths of K=5 and K=7 and
rates 1/4 to 3/4, which make up the majority of GSM use cases. Speedup
from the current implementation is in the range of 5 to 20 depending on
the processor and code type. API is unchanged.
Tested on Haswell (i7-4770K) and Atom (D2550). Additional test codes
from osmo-bts are included. Further tests for AWGN bit-error-rate
and benchmarks can be found in the following repository.
https://github.com/ttsou/osmo-conv-test
Here are some examples.
Bit error test for GPRS CS2 with SNR of 5 dB and 100000 bursts.
$ ./conv_test -c 2 -e -r 5 -i 100000
=================================================
[+] Testing: GPRS CS2
[.] Specs: (N=2, K=5, non-recursive, flushed, not punctured)
[.] Input length : ret = 290 exp = 290 -> OK
[.] Output length : ret = 588 exp = 588 -> OK
[.] BER tests:
[..] Testing base:
[..] Input BER.......................... 0.042443
[..] Output BER......................... 0.000006
[..] Output FER......................... 0.001350 (135)
[..] Testing SIMD:
[..] Input BER.......................... 0.042460
[..] Output BER......................... 0.000005
[..] Output FER......................... 0.001240 (124)
Timed AFS benchmark with 8 threads and 100000 bursts per thread.
$ ./conv_test -b -c 10 -j 8 -i 100000
=================================================
[+] Testing: GSM TCH/AFS 6.7
[.] Specs: (N=4, K=5, recursive, flushed, punctured)
[.] Input length : ret = 140 exp = 140 -> OK
[.] Output length : ret = 448 exp = 448 -> OK
[.] Performance benchmark:
[..] Encoding / Decoding 800000 bursts on 8 thread(s):
[..] Testing base:
[..] Elapsed time....................... 4.320001 secs
[..] Rate............................... 25.925920 Mbps
[..] Testing SIMD:
[..] Elapsed time....................... 0.458272 secs
[..] Rate............................... 244.396341 Mbps
[..] Speedup............................ 9.426718
-TT
Good afternoon!
In libbsc/bsc_init.c we have the following case:
case GSM_BAND_900:
if (bts->c0->arfcn < 1 ||
(bts->c0->arfcn > 124 && bts->c0->arfcn < 955) ||
bts->c0->arfcn > 1023) {
LOGP(DNM, LOGL_ERROR, "GSM900 channel must be between 1-124, 955-1023.\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
break;
3GPP 45.005, table 2-2 gives valid channel numbers as:
P-GSM900 -> 1-124,
E-GSM900 -> 0-124 and 975-1023
R-GSM900 -> 0-124 and 955-1023
ER-GSM900 -> 0-124 and 940-1023
The code looks to bounds check ARFCN closest to R-GSM900, but omits ARFCN 0.
Is the check "bts->c0->arfcn < 1" erroneous, or am I missing some history?
Also should it really check for the R-GSM 900 range, or should it be E-GSM (more common)?
The other band checks look correct.
Kind Regards,
Mike
PS: osmo-arfcn is okay with ARFCN 0:
$ ./osmo-arfcn -a 0
ARFCN 0: Uplink 890.0 MHz / Downlink 935.0 MHz
Currently the DL sometimes hangs and sometimes a lot of messages
(still not able to send PDU) are logged. This is caused by an invalid
timer delay computation, setting msecs either to 0 or to some big value.
This is due to an '&' operator at the wrong place, accessing some
parts in fc instead of the first element of the list.
This commit fixes that issue.
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
---
src/gb/gprs_bssgp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/gb/gprs_bssgp.c b/src/gb/gprs_bssgp.c
index 4c93b69..fe4fcca 100644
--- a/src/gb/gprs_bssgp.c
+++ b/src/gb/gprs_bssgp.c
@@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ static int fc_queue_timer_cfg(struct bssgp_flow_control *fc)
if (llist_empty(&fc->queue))
return 0;
- fcqe = llist_entry(&fc->queue.next, struct bssgp_fc_queue_element,
+ fcqe = llist_entry(fc->queue.next, struct bssgp_fc_queue_element,
list);
if (fc->bucket_leak_rate != 0) {
--
1.9.1
In test_rtp_seq_state an assignment is accidently done within an
assertion.
This commit changes that into a comparison as it was intended.
Fixes: Coverity CID 1295457, 1295458
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
---
openbsc/tests/mgcp/mgcp_transcoding_test.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/openbsc/tests/mgcp/mgcp_transcoding_test.c b/openbsc/tests/mgcp/mgcp_transcoding_test.c
index 1b8001e..c5c0a0b 100644
--- a/openbsc/tests/mgcp/mgcp_transcoding_test.c
+++ b/openbsc/tests/mgcp/mgcp_transcoding_test.c
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static void test_rtp_seq_state(void)
OSMO_ASSERT(cont >= 0);
OSMO_ASSERT(state->is_running);
OSMO_ASSERT(state->next_seq == 2);
- OSMO_ASSERT(state->next_time = 240);
+ OSMO_ASSERT(state->next_time == 240);
/* verify that the right timestamp was written */
OSMO_ASSERT(len == audio_packets_pcma[0].len);
--
1.9.1