Hello Harald,
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:43:12 +0200, "Harald Welte" laforge@gnumonks.org wrote:
If you're interested, you can certainly try for yourself with your nanoBTS...
You are joking, right ? How should it work on my Windows machine if it does not work on Linux ;-) ?
Best regards, Dieter
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:15:47PM +0200, Dieter Spaar wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:43:12 +0200, "Harald Welte" laforge@gnumonks.org wrote:
If you're interested, you can certainly try for yourself with your nanoBTS...
You are joking, right ? How should it work on my Windows machine if it does not work on Linux ;-) ?
I'm telling you, OpenBSC's RTP proxy works fine. I've just made another call and there are no drop-outs of .8 seconds or anything like that.
As all it uses is the sockets API, i.e. the very same calls that the input/ipaccess.c module already uses, I think it should be very easy to make it build using the posix compatibility of cygwin.
Somehow the pcap is missing packets, but I think that's an independent/different problem.
On Wednesday 29 July 2009 15:48:32 Harald Welte wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:15:47PM +0200, Dieter Spaar wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:43:12 +0200, "Harald Welte" laforge@gnumonks.org
wrote:
If you're interested, you can certainly try for yourself with your nanoBTS...
You are joking, right ? How should it work on my Windows machine if it does not work on Linux ;-) ?
I'm telling you, OpenBSC's RTP proxy works fine. I've just made another call and there are no drop-outs of .8 seconds or anything like that.
As all it uses is the sockets API, i.e. the very same calls that the input/ipaccess.c module already uses, I think it should be very easy to make it build using the posix compatibility of cygwin.
Somehow the pcap is missing packets, but I think that's an independent/different problem.
And it is unlikely that the BTS is doing both, sending out packets and routing on the BTS? What happens if you skip packets on RTP proxy? does it start skipping? okay, another stupid question :}
z.