Sounds bizarre.
I really don't know anything about it, but I do remember a call with
nick [at]
nickvsnetworking.com some years back and everything about that
conversation was reasonable.
Isn't it simply a case of reaching out and asking for the license terms
to be clarified, I'd be surprised if the response were to be silence or
even negative.
(OK I really must learn to stop being surprised by what I'm surprised
about, they way the world is.)
Is this simply some situation where Nick has not understood the
conundrum in which the German law-abiding citizen is placed due to a
lack of explicit statement of licensing terms?
Also, (and here I thought I understood correctly), but you may know
better; Github's terms of service:
5. License Grant to Other
Users<https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/github-terms/github-terms-o…
Any User-Generated Content you post publicly, including issues,
comments, and contributions to other Users' repositories, may be viewed
by others. By setting your repositories to be viewed publicly, you agree
to allow others to view and "fork" your repositories (this means that
others may make their own copies of Content from your repositories in
repositories they control).
If you set your pages and repositories to be viewed publicly, you grant
each User of GitHub a nonexclusive, worldwide license to use, display,
and perform Your Content through the GitHub Service and to reproduce
Your Content solely on GitHub as permitted through GitHub's
functionality (for example, through forking). You may grant further
rights if you adopt a license
<https://docs.github.com/en/communities/setting-up-your-project-for-healthy-contributions/adding-a-license-to-a-repository#including-an-open-source-license-in-your-repository>.
If you are uploading Content you did not create or own, you are
responsible for ensuring that the Content you upload is licensed under
terms that grant these permissions to other GitHub Users.
Are German user's of Github somehow excluded from this global right to fork?
I know Mexico updated copyright law over the last few years, but maybe
this implicit exclusive copyright if not claimed is not the same here, I
could ask.. but I think best to reach out, no?
k/