On 04.06.2014 16:28, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 10:49:00AM +0200, Jacob Erlbeck wrote:
Note that RAI := MCC MNC LAC RAC, and RAC := MCC MNC LAC (see GSM
\ / ^^^^ LAI RAC LAI ??
Oops, that was a typo of mine. Of course it's LAI := MCC MNC LAC.
- { "inv-rai", "Invalid Routing Area Identifier " },
+/* look-up a peer by its Routeing Area Identification (RAI) */
The spec you mention is using "routing". Please be consistent.
Unfortunately the specs themselves are not consistent with respect to this, GSM 08.18 is using the British variant. Thus the identifier in gsm_08_18.h also use the ROUTEING variant.
The C file already was mixing the British and the American English variants. This commit didn't add any 'rout(e)ing' term, it focused on the 'code' issue.
While I agree that we should strive for consistency, I'd rather put it into a specific commit when we've settled on which variant shall be taken.
Jacob
Given the question about s,RAC,LAI, I am waiting for your feedback.
holger