On 04.06.2014 16:28, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 10:49:00AM +0200, Jacob
Erlbeck wrote:
Note that RAI := MCC MNC LAC RAC, and RAC := MCC
MNC LAC (see GSM
\ / ^^^^
LAI RAC LAI ??
Oops, that was a typo of mine. Of course it's LAI := MCC MNC LAC.
+ { "inv-rai", "Invalid
Routing Area Identifier " },
+/* look-up a peer by its Routeing Area Identification (RAI) */
The spec you mention is using "routing". Please be consistent.
Unfortunately the specs themselves are not consistent with respect to
this, GSM 08.18 is using the British variant. Thus the identifier in
gsm_08_18.h also use the ROUTEING variant.
The C file already was mixing the British and the American English
variants. This commit didn't add any 'rout(e)ing' term, it focused on
the 'code' issue.
While I agree that we should strive for consistency, I'd rather put it
into a specific commit when we've settled on which variant shall be taken.
Jacob
Given
the question about s,RAC,LAI, I am waiting for your feedback.
holger
--
- Jacob Erlbeck <jerlbeck(a)sysmocom.de>
http://www.sysmocom.de/
=======================================================================
* sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH
* Schivelbeiner Str. 5
* 10439 Berlin, Germany
* Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B
* Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Directors: Holger Freyther, Harald Welte