Well I guess you're right. I modified the source as suggested and tried it
out. But there was no difference.
The reason I want to boost up its transmitpower, is because I wanted to test
the handover. If our nanoBTS acts like a commercial provider I just see one
MS trying to register to our nanoBTS. This is because it's just a meter away
from our bts, while my mobile (an HTC Artemis) doesn't register to our bts
with a distance of less than 10 m.
Even when I switch off and on, while I'm just a meter away of our bts, my
mobile somehow keeps registering to the real provider (I tested by simply
calling someone).
Another interesting thing is, if I simulate a total different provider,
which doesn't exist here, I can easely find our bts, with manual search.
Also the MS seems to have its own database of all the country codes,
networkcodes and its belonging providernames. I thought the BSC sends these
information to the MS and the MS checks it with SIM data. (But that;s
off-topic).
Greetings.
2009/6/3 Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org>
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 05:48:12PM +0200, Nordin
wrote:
Thanks for your response Harald,
Well I read in the mailinglist with the title: BS-11 runs, but no
Network on my Mobile, date: Thu Apr 2 18:03:24 CEST 2009
about modifying the TRX power for the BS-11, so I could try that too for
the ip.acces?
Isn't it a bad idea to add abis_nm_bs11_set_trx_power(&bts->trx[0],
BS11_TRX_POWER_GSM_250mW); in the bootstrap sequence? It won't harm if
one tries right?
go ahead and try, but I would bet on just about anything that it does not
work.
Those are vendor-specific proprietary extensions of 12.21. Values defined
by
Siemens have no significance whatsoever for ip.access
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org>
http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)