Hi Holger,
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 11:11:13AM +0100, Holger Freyther wrote:
I might not have time until next week to replicate it
(and my nanobts is not
with me right now either). IIRC (my first memory but the commit message points
me to it as well): I struggled a lot to parse ipaccess-find (IPAC_MSGT_ID_GET)
from the nanoBTS.
Ah. ok. I've not looked at ipaccess-find/UDP in a long time. Only at the normal
procedure at OML/RSL start-up.
It seemed it was disobeying a reasonable TLV structure
and the closest I found
back then seemed to have been this patch? Could you check if the testcase matches
an ipaccess-find result?
Yes, I will check for that. The test case definitely does not match the IPA CCM
seen inside OML/RSL from a nanoBTS, not even from the first traces I have from 2010.
I will try to find some next during the week to have a
look.
I think the pointer to ipaccess-find was sufficient, thanks.
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org>
http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)