Hi Neels,
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 04:07:15PM +0200, Neels Hofmeyr wrote:
We tend to use the CamelCase in manuals and for
project names, and the dashed
version for git repositories. We also tend to use only "Osmo":
actually, it's mostly the dashed version for the executables, and then
the git repo follows that.
OsmoCellNet
osmo-cell-net
I like shorter names (as long as they are still concise). OTOH it could make
sense to mark the overall release with the full "Osmocom" instead, because
it's
not just a specific program.
I also like the shorter names. However, we already have the Osmocom
trademark in US and EU, and it might make sense to reflect that in
naming, should the need ever arise to defend against a copycat or some
other misrepresentation of the project and/or its software.
Personally I would be fine with either one:
osmo-cell-net / OsmoCellNet
or
osmocom-cell-net / OsmocomCellNet
my vote goes for the latter, due to above reasoning.
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org>
http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)