This tight integration of a db back end will have lot more limitation when
it comes to scalable deployment. i.e. 100s of BTS connecting to more than
one BSCs which will need a common database backend as the the HLR. We might
not need BSCs to talk to HLR in proper MAP interface, but atleast they can
do talk directly to HLR DB using db driver for now.
Is there anyway we can get into mysql integration. I will give it a try if
some one can put bit more light on that way.
Rgds
Nik
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 01:43:44AM +0100, Holger Hans
Peter Freyther wrote:
On 03/02/2012 01:33 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
Nik Pakar wrote:
I'm also interested in this topic, so if you
try it out please share
results.
another topic is to make looking up a subscriber async and writing...
just
write through.
this is the much more important topic. Without that change, it is
completely useless to switch to another database. In fact, it may make
things worse due to higher latency caused by inter-process
communication between DB client (openbsc) and DB server.
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org>
http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)