On 24 Jun 2015, at 00:27, Alexander Chemeris alexander.chemeris@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Alexander,
Please note that the current behavior of this command is that it already applies the change immediately by setting bts->ms_max_power. This value is then used at rsl_rx_chan_rqd() to initialize lchan->ms_power. But it does not apply it to SIs sent by the same BTS, which makes the effect of the command inconsistent. The commit I suggest just makes the behavior of the command consistent.
we have completed the circle now and I don’t want to run another round. The ms_max_power aspect is annoying but it shows that we need to progress and look at the bigger picture. Are you willing to do that?
holger