On 24 Jun 2015, at 00:27, Alexander Chemeris
<alexander.chemeris(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Alexander,
Please note that the current behavior of this command
is that it
already applies the change immediately by setting bts->ms_max_power.
This value is then used at rsl_rx_chan_rqd() to initialize
lchan->ms_power. But it does not apply it to SIs sent by the same BTS,
which makes the effect of the command inconsistent. The commit I
suggest just makes the behavior of the command consistent.
we have completed the circle now and I don’t want to run another round. The
ms_max_power aspect is annoying but it shows that we need to progress and
look at the bigger picture. Are you willing to do that?
holger