OpenBSC

openbsc@lists.osmocom.org

8 participants
4276 discussions

Re: OpenBSC Digest, Vol 72, Issue 18
by Sipos Csaba 29 Oct '20

29 Oct '20

Hi Andreas, Fixed the patch. Yes there is a gap in the middle, that is why it is split to two: 1..72 and 132..239 is the correct one and it uses a reverse numbering like the Slovak or Czech networks. This is the reason the NMT phones in Hungary was not compatible with any other country, and the phones country settings were locked to Hungary only. For example in my MCR4800XL the country cannot be set, yet if you read out the EPROM, it contains the country settings for all country, but it is locked down to Hungary only. Regards, Csaba <openbsc-request(a)lists.osmocom.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2020. okt. 28., Sze, 13:00): > Send OpenBSC mailing list submissions to > openbsc(a)lists.osmocom.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.osmocom.org/mailman/listinfo/openbsc > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > openbsc-request(a)lists.osmocom.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > openbsc-owner(a)lists.osmocom.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of OpenBSC digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. [PATCH] Adds country specific settings for Hungary. (Sipos Csaba) > 2. Re: [PATCH] Adds country specific settings for Hungary. > (Andreas Eversberg) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:08:46 +0100 > From: Sipos Csaba <dchardware(a)gmail.com> > To: "openbsc-request(a)lists.osmocom.org" <openbsc(a)lists.osmocom.org> > Subject: [PATCH] Adds country specific settings for Hungary. > Message-ID: > <CALQr=E9WMDr_-KBwWdQAH=UgB88nd= > ph2p1G2dOSG8F_CtY_Jg(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > This is the final patch for Hungary specific settings for the > osmocom-analog project. > > Tested against a locked Motorola MCR4800XL, it works on all channels and > TAs. > > Please let me know if any more work needs to be done. > > Regards, > Csaba >

2 1

[PATCH] Adds country specific settings for Hungary.
by Sipos Csaba 28 Oct '20

28 Oct '20

This is the final patch for Hungary specific settings for the osmocom-analog project. Tested against a locked Motorola MCR4800XL, it works on all channels and TAs. Please let me know if any more work needs to be done. Regards, Csaba

2 1

Fwd: NMT-450 - partial success
by Sipos Csaba 27 Oct '20

27 Oct '20

Hi, I know it is a bit off topic, but as osmocom-analog has no dedicated mail list and my every attempt to contact Andreas lead to silence, I thought this is the closest one to discuss it. I try to create an NMT-450 network with Motorola MCR4800XL phones, and a LimeSDR-mini. As the phones are locked to "Hungary" using a specific raster and a large gap in the middle, first I needed to dig out the details, find out the country code and create a patch so at least the phone is willing to lock onto the DS signal. I managed to do all that, so now the phone is actually able to decode the network and lock onto the signal. My issue is with the uplink: when the phone tries Traffic Area update (the phone's uplink transmission burts is clearly seen with a spectrum analyzer), the network side is not able to detect the uplink burst at all. Not even as bad, or incorrectly formatted frame. Andreas has a site which describes how to set up the uplink side and do some tests: http://osmocom-analog.eversberg.eu/docs/sdr.html I followed that guide and when the uplink burst from the phone arrives, the RX IQ constellation monitor indicates a correct burst with proper power (the burst is nicely round and in the green area). If I try to set up a call to the phone using the correct country code and phone number, the phone clearly responds to the paging request, as the 3 paging attempt generates 3 uplink bursts. Again, with no reception/decoding on the network side. Tried with two phones of the same type, the effect is the same. I have two questions: 1. Where to send patches for the osmocom-analog project? 2. Does anyone have an idea what can be wrong with my setup? One more thing I noticed: compared to the channel frequency used to set the NMT network up, the uplink is a couple kHz shifted: http://www.imagebam.com/image/d17e881357285965 As it can be seen, the uplink burst appears 3-4kHz left relative to the downlink signal. The network is started with the following command: nmt -k 239 -k 235 -Y HU,1 --limesdr-mini --sdr-rx-gain 20 Any and all help is appreciated. Regards, Csaba

3 6

[PATCH 0/1] pysim: make random seed function python3 compatible
by Jeremy Herbert 27 Oct '20

27 Oct '20

Currently the random seed function _digits is not python3 compatible as it passes a unicode string to the sha1 function. It generates the following exception: Using PC/SC reader interface Card programming failed with an execption: ---------------------8<--------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "./pySim-prog.py", line 718, in <module> rc = process_card(opts, first, card_handler) File "./pySim-prog.py", line 643, in process_card cp = gen_parameters(opts) File "./pySim-prog.py", line 342, in gen_parameters iccid += _digits(opts.secret, 'ccid', ml, opts.num) File "./pySim-prog.py", line 228, in _digits s = hashlib.sha1(secret + usage + '%d' % num) TypeError: Unicode-objects must be encoded before hashing ---------------------8<--------------------- This patch fixes this problem. Jeremy Herbert (1): make random seed function python3 compatible pySim-prog.py | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1

2 4

libosmocore: macOS support?
by Ludovic Rousseau 15 Oct '20

15 Oct '20

Hello, I try to build utils/osmo-sim-test.c on macOS. For that I need to build the complete libosmocore project. I already patched/hacked some source code file to make them compile on macOS but now the compiler fails on src/vty/cpu_sched_vty.c because cpu_set_t is Linux-specific. The problem is that src/vty/cpu_sched_vty.c contains *a lot* of use of cpu_set_t usage. I am pretty sure utils/osmo-sim-test.c will not need the functions defined in cpu_sched_vty.c. Is it possible to build utils/osmo-sim-test.c without building the complete libosmocore project? Any interest in macOS support (even partial & unofficial support)? Yes, the easiest option is to use Linux. But my main computer uses macOS. And I like challenges :-) Regards, -- Dr. Ludovic Rousseau

2 1

E1 line debug L1/L2
by Ivan Babanov 14 Oct '20

14 Oct '20

Hello all, Brief question. Is it possible to debug E1 line by connecting it to the 2nd port of the same NIC making a wired loop? Is it enough to open->ioctl->read from /dev/dahdi/channel to get a stream of LAPD SABME messages transmitted by BSC? A bit more details for those interested I'm still trying to bring up BTS Nokia Flexi with OSMO-BSC. I'm using an E1 card Digium TE405P on the server side. OSMO-BSC is connected with Nokia BTS via a single E1 line. Looks like on Level1 everything is ok because BTS can detect the link and raise an alarm if the wire is getting disconnected. I can observe some data from timeslots on BTS side and if some channel is configured as D-Channel in /etc/dahdi/system I see transmission of block "01111110". But the problem is that LAPD link is not establishing. I can't find any tries on BTS side and BSC does not receive anything from BTS, just set of SABME messages in PCAP file. T200 expires and so on. I tried various T200 values. So, now it looks for me like L1 does not receive anything from L2 on BSC side and nothing is transmitted over the wire to BTS. dahdi_tool shows status "OK" So, my nearest plan to check data transmission over wired loopback. Thank you Babanov Ivan

4 10

Osmocom Phone forcing encryption
by Radiarisainana Sitraka 10 Oct '20

10 Oct '20

Hello,i would like to ask if it's possible to forcing the encryption of osmcom phone like A5/1 or A5/2 or A5/3? How to process it? Chears,

2 1

Application specific VTY attributes
by Vadim Yanitskiy 06 Oct '20

06 Oct '20

Hi Philipp, while reading your comments to: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/19670 https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-mgw/+/20250 I realized that it would be better to discuss here. My initial idea was that the absence of attributes (in the command definition and thus in the VTY reference) implicitly indicates that a given VTY command in the 'config' node comes into effect immediately. This way we would only need to add attributes to commands requiring program restart or reestablishment of some link(s) / connection(s). However, in some applications *most* of the commands may require full program restart. Or the opposite: most commands may apply immediately. Adding same attributes to every command is annoying, so I came up with a concept of default 'applies when' policy: what if we add a new field to 'struct cmd_node' indicating default attributes of all commands belonging to it? struct cmd_node foo_node = { .node = FOO_NODE, .prompt = "%s(config-net)# ", .vtysh = 1, .usrattr = (1 << FOO_VTY_ATTR_RESTART_FULL), // (!) }; This way a DEFUN() command definition would inherit foo_node.usrattr, and a DEFUN_USRATTR() command definition would override it. dexter wrote: > I just wonder if there could be a VTY_ATTR_RESTART_FULL predefined in > libosmore. Almost any of the osmo program will need it. Maybe also an > VTY_ATTR_RESTART_IMMEDIATE? ACK. I think they could be even moved to generic attributes: /*! Attributes (flags) for \ref cmd_element */ enum { CMD_ATTR_DEPRECATED = (1 << 0), CMD_ATTR_HIDDEN = (1 << 1), CMD_ATTR_APPLY_IMMEDIATE = (1 << 2), CMD_ATTR_APPLY_FULL_RESTART = (1 << 3), }; dexter wrote: > Maybe we could have some standard letters defined in libosmocore > for standard situations: > F = Full restart required > I = Applied Immediately ACK. We can also agree that generic (pre-defined) attributes use upper case letters, while the application specific ones use lower case? What do you think about these ideas? If you agree, and nobody has any objections, I can quickly implement them in libosmocore. Would be also nice to know what other developers think. Neels, Harald, Pau, Daniel? Best regards, Vadim. -- - Vadim Yanitskiy <vyanitskiy at sysmocom.de> http://www.sysmocom.de/ ======================================================================= * sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH * Alt-Moabit 93 * 10559 Berlin, Germany * Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B * Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Director: Harald Welte

4 10

gerrit upgade / new syntax for push to topics
by Harald Welte 04 Oct '20

04 Oct '20

Dear all, I did a major upgrade from the (unsupported) 2.16.x gerrit version to the latest 3.2.x series. For a detailed list of changes, please see the documentation / changelog. At least one change affects our day-to-day usage: How to push to a 'tpopic'. While in the past we would have done something like git push gerrit HEAD:refs/for/master/fr we now need to write git push gerrit HEAD:refs/for/master%topic=fr Don't ask me why that change was made... Regards, Harald -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

1 0

libosmocore stderr log performance / blocking
by Harald Welte 30 Sep '20

30 Sep '20

Hi! >From time to time we've been discussing logging related stalling of osmocom programs, particularly in the context of the stderr log target. In general, when we log to stderr, we perform a blocking, buffered write. So any slow output on stderr will slow down the entire osmocom program. I've taken some time to play with this using bpftrace and usdt (static userspace probes) in order to determine the latency of log statements in osmocom programs. My test program doesn't do anything else but an endless LOGP() of verying length (from 1..512 characters). It was executed on a Lenovo Thinkpad X260 (i7-6600U, 16GB RAM, SATA SSD with btrfs on top of dm-crypt). I've compared * launching the program in uxterm * launching the program in gnome-terminal * launching the program in screen (detached) * launching the program in screen (attached; printing via uxterm) * launching the program with 2>/dev/null * launching the program with 2>/file/on/btrfs/on/ssd * launching the program from systemd (with journald) * replacing stderr logging with gsmtap log target (without wqueue) The resulting histograms of the time spent for writing the logs are below. The git repo containing the test program, the libosmocore usdt patch and the bpftrace program can be found at git://git.osmocom.org/laforge/osmo-logbench.git == launching the program in uxterm @usecs: [2, 4) 30 | | [4, 8) 199963 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@| [8, 16) 82294 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ | [16, 32) 6897 |@ | [32, 64) 1649 | | [64, 128) 57 | | [128, 256) 221 | | [256, 512) 8588 |@@ | [512, 1K) 13062 |@@@ | [1K, 2K) 144 | | [2K, 4K) 14 | | [4K, 8K) 3 | | [8K, 16K) 0 | | [16K, 32K) 0 | | [32K, 64K) 0 | | [64K, 128K) 0 | | [128K, 256K) 0 | | [256K, 512K) 0 | | [512K, 1M) 0 | | [1M, 2M) 0 | | [2M, 4M) 0 | | [4M, 8M) 0 | | [8M, 16M) 0 | | [16M, 32M) 0 | | [32M, 64M) 0 | | [64M, 128M) 0 | | [128M, 256M) 0 | | [256M, 512M) 0 | | [512M, 1G) 28 | | == launching the program in gnome-terminal @usecs: [2, 4) 32387 |@@@ | [4, 8) 457668 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@| [8, 16) 44408 |@@@@@ | [16, 32) 466 | | [32, 64) 63 | | [64, 128) 9 | | [128, 256) 3 | | [256, 512) 53 | | [512, 1K) 0 | | [1K, 2K) 0 | | [2K, 4K) 0 | | [4K, 8K) 1 | | [8K, 16K) 0 | | [16K, 32K) 0 | | [32K, 64K) 39 | | [64K, 128K) 125 | | [128K, 256K) 0 | | [256K, 512K) 0 | | [512K, 1M) 0 | | [1M, 2M) 0 | | [2M, 4M) 0 | | [4M, 8M) 0 | | [8M, 16M) 0 | | [16M, 32M) 0 | | [32M, 64M) 0 | | [64M, 128M) 0 | | [128M, 256M) 0 | | [256M, 512M) 0 | | [512M, 1G) 0 | | [1G, 2G) 1 | | So we can see that gnome-terminal tends to be faster on most stderr-writes, but at the expens of introducing a few long-delays in the 32..128ms bucket. == launching the program in screen (detached) @usecs: [2, 4) 107649 |@@@@@@@@ | [4, 8) 699672 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@| [8, 16) 15262 |@ | [16, 32) 622 | | [32, 64) 5840 | | [64, 128) 42728 |@@@ | [128, 256) 14000 |@ | [256, 512) 68 | | [512, 1K) 3 | | [1K, 2K) 0 | | [2K, 4K) 1 | | [4K, 8K) 0 | | [8K, 16K) 0 | | [16K, 32K) 0 | | [32K, 64K) 0 | | [64K, 128K) 0 | | [128K, 256K) 0 | | [256K, 512K) 0 | | [512K, 1M) 0 | | [1M, 2M) 0 | | [2M, 4M) 0 | | [4M, 8M) 0 | | [8M, 16M) 0 | | [16M, 32M) 0 | | [32M, 64M) 0 | | [64M, 128M) 0 | | [128M, 256M) 0 | | [256M, 512M) 0 | | [512M, 1G) 0 | | [1G, 2G) 50 | | * launching the program in screen (attached; printing via uxterm) @usecs: [2, 4) 2 | | [4, 8) 67887 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@| [8, 16) 30378 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ | [16, 32) 58881 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ | [32, 64) 5188 |@@@ | [64, 128) 301 | | [128, 256) 61 | | [256, 512) 3963 |@@@ | [512, 1K) 7603 |@@@@@ | [1K, 2K) 407 | | [2K, 4K) 42 | | [4K, 8K) 20 | | [8K, 16K) 0 | | [16K, 32K) 0 | | [32K, 64K) 0 | | [64K, 128K) 0 | | [128K, 256K) 0 | | [256K, 512K) 0 | | [512K, 1M) 0 | | [1M, 2M) 0 | | [2M, 4M) 0 | | [4M, 8M) 0 | | [8M, 16M) 0 | | [16M, 32M) 0 | | [32M, 64M) 0 | | [64M, 128M) 0 | | [128M, 256M) 0 | | [256M, 512M) 0 | | [512M, 1G) 0 | | [1G, 2G) 1 | | so intrestingly, attaching the screen will significantly slow down stderr. It seems screen doesn't do sufficient buffering internally, or it blocks the osmocom program until not only it has updated its internal buffer, but also written to the output of the attached uxterm? == launching the program with 2>/dev/null @usecs: [1] 2202080 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@| [2, 4) 26966 | | [4, 8) 1107 | | [8, 16) 305 | | [16, 32) 10 | | [32, 64) 6 | | [64, 128) 0 | | [128, 256) 0 | | [256, 512) 1 | | [512, 1K) 0 | | [1K, 2K) 0 | | [2K, 4K) 0 | | [4K, 8K) 0 | | [8K, 16K) 0 | | [16K, 32K) 0 | | [32K, 64K) 0 | | [64K, 128K) 0 | | [128K, 256K) 0 | | [256K, 512K) 0 | | [512K, 1M) 0 | | [1M, 2M) 0 | | [2M, 4M) 0 | | [4M, 8M) 0 | | [8M, 16M) 0 | | [16M, 32M) 0 | | [32M, 64M) 0 | | [64M, 128M) 0 | | [128M, 256M) 0 | | [256M, 512M) 0 | | [512M, 1G) 0 | | [1G, 2G) 153 | | unsurprisingly, this turns out to be rather fast == launching the program with 2>/file/on/btrfs/on/ssd @usecs: [2, 4) 2275464 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@| [4, 8) 265612 |@@@@@@ | [8, 16) 9384 | | [16, 32) 368 | | [32, 64) 4 | | [64, 128) 24 | | [128, 256) 3 | | [256, 512) 1 | | [512, 1K) 0 | | [1K, 2K) 0 | | [2K, 4K) 0 | | [4K, 8K) 0 | | [8K, 16K) 0 | | [16K, 32K) 0 | | [32K, 64K) 0 | | [64K, 128K) 0 | | [128K, 256K) 0 | | [256K, 512K) 0 | | [512K, 1M) 0 | | [1M, 2M) 0 | | [2M, 4M) 0 | | [4M, 8M) 0 | | [8M, 16M) 0 | | [16M, 32M) 0 | | [32M, 64M) 0 | | [64M, 128M) 0 | | [128M, 256M) 0 | | [256M, 512M) 0 | | [512M, 1G) 0 | | [1G, 2G) 95 | | I've tried creating some load using a cocnrrent dd of the underlying block device, but couldn't make out any difference. I guess this shows how good the I/O subsystem is. Yes, some writes are slower than writing to /dev/null, but == launching the program from systemd (with journald) [2, 4) 1060607 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@| [4, 8) 75133 |@@@ | [8, 16) 724 | | [16, 32) 107 | | [32, 64) 8 | | [64, 128) 8 | | [128, 256) 0 | | [256, 512) 0 | | [512, 1K) 0 | | [1K, 2K) 0 | | [2K, 4K) 0 | | [4K, 8K) 0 | | [8K, 16K) 0 | | [16K, 32K) 0 | | [32K, 64K) 0 | | [64K, 128K) 38 | | [128K, 256K) 0 | | [256K, 512K) 0 | | [512K, 1M) 0 | | [1M, 2M) 0 | | [2M, 4M) 0 | | [4M, 8M) 0 | | [8M, 16M) 0 | | [16M, 32M) 0 | | [32M, 64M) 0 | | [64M, 128M) 0 | | [128M, 256M) 0 | | [256M, 512M) 0 | | [512M, 1G) 0 | | [1G, 2G) 1 | | This is also pretty fast. There are some writes in the 64..128ms range, though. Those are likely going to cause problems in timing critical programs like osmo-bts, osmo-trx or osmo-mgw. * replacing stderr logging with gsmtap log target (without wqueue) @usecs: [4, 8) 776978 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@| [8, 16) 1771 | | [16, 32) 60 | | [32, 64) 0 | | [64, 128) 1 | | [128, 256) 0 | | [256, 512) 0 | | [512, 1K) 0 | | [1K, 2K) 0 | | [2K, 4K) 0 | | [4K, 8K) 0 | | [8K, 16K) 0 | | [16K, 32K) 0 | | [32K, 64K) 0 | | [64K, 128K) 0 | | [128K, 256K) 0 | | [256K, 512K) 0 | | [512K, 1M) 0 | | [1M, 2M) 0 | | [2M, 4M) 0 | | [4M, 8M) 0 | | [8M, 16M) 0 | | [16M, 32M) 0 | | [32M, 64M) 0 | | [64M, 128M) 0 | | [128M, 256M) 0 | | [256M, 512M) 0 | | [512M, 1G) 0 | | [1G, 2G) 0 | | [2G, 4G) 82 | | Ignoring the strange (and certainly bogus) artefacts in the 2..4s bin at the bottom, writes to the GSMTAP UDP socket tend to be quite fast, much faster than anything via stderr. Even faster than stderr-to-dev-null. == conclusion all-in-all, it looks not too bad at least on a relatively unloaded couple-of-years-old laptop. I would have expected worse. We can definitely see that there are non-neglectable delays created by both systemd/journald as well as gnome-terminal. One idea would be to play with setvbuf(3) to increase stderr buffering inside libc. The other idea would be to do our own buffering using osmo_wqueue() on the raw, unbuffered stderr-fd, which would then be in non-blocking mode and handled vis osmocom select. We'd have to add some kind of limit for that buffer in order to avoid OOM situations. -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)osmocom.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

4 10

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

OpenBSC