OpenBSC

openbsc@lists.osmocom.org

16 participants
4247 discussions

nanoBTS question
by Albert Paijmans 21 Sep '10

21 Sep '10

Hi, I have been looking around and I am wondering, when you are interested in a consumer 3G / Femto or Pico cell it might be very cheap through AT&T at around $150. Might somebody be working rverse engineering on those cheaper cells? The nanoBTS from ipaccess is costing euro 3450 Mind you this is without any software or server, just a single nanoBTS unit. Does anybody have any experience and info about pricing? I find this price crazy but it is the only way in the Netherland to buy it officially. Also I have a license for GSM frequencies ad for that price they only send it to an address. Thanks Albert

3 6

Picocell from HAY SYSTEMS
by Konrad Meier 20 Sep '10

20 Sep '10

Hello, Searching the web I found the following BTS: http://www.haysystems.com/mobile-networks/hsl-picocell/ The System seams to be very similar to the ip.access nanoBTS. POE and Abis over IP. Can someone roughly estimate the time needed to integrate this BTS into openBSC? The developer I have in mind already has some experience in OpenBSC. What exactly is needed to complete this task? The company also has a different BTS called Femtocell. The interesting thing is that they offer a "Femtocell Trial Package" for USD 7200. The trail Package include BSC Software and two BTS. I also has a Network Interface but I found nothing about the protocol used between BSC and BTS. Regards Konrad

2 1

RRLP:posCapabilityReq
by Andreas Schmidt-Dannert 18 Sep '10

18 Sep '10

Hello all, I am trying to get a Positioning Capability Response from a MS by sending an Positioning Capability Request. I checked ETSI TS 144 031 (v9.2.0) to figure out how to build the package. Only the "extended-reference" field is mandatory and so I tried to send a package just with the content of that field. The "extend-reference" consists of the smlc-code and the transactionID. By testing I found out that I have to send at least 6 octets. The first octet is as usual the referenceNumber and to specify the rrlp component. The last 2 bits of the 3rd octet and the first 4 bits of the 4th octet are for the smlc-code. The rest of the 4th octet, the full 5th octet and the first 6 bits of the 6th octet are for the transactionID. Furthermore the first 3 bits of the second octet are for the choice extension. Anyway I have no clue what the meaning is of the last 6 bits of the 2nd octet and the first 6 bits of the 3rd octet although it seems like that the 4th bit of the second octet is an extension bit. However if I send a package I always get "Meassage too short" error. Adding octets does not help. Anyone has ever got a Positioning Capability Response for a Request? If yes I would really appreciate if that someone would share this Request with me. Wireshark always shows me that I have sent a Positioning Capability Request but the Response never comes but the error message. RRLP is implemented in the phone since I get responses for a Measure Position Request. I think by now I have sent around 500 packages :) One example I am using is: 0x30 0x0E 0x00 0xFF 0xA2 0x04 Best, Andreas

1 0

BTS for sale?
by Seungju Kim 18 Sep '10

18 Sep '10

Is there any bs-11 or nanobts for sale at the moment? Sent from my iPhone

1 0

opensbsc
by DRamirez＠baja.gob.mx 18 Sep '10

18 Sep '10

Hi i have installed the openbsc in my computer and also i have an ip.access bts but i don´t know what to do next i couldn´f find what is the commands to detect the bts. i will appreciate your help. have a good day, thank you

2 1

Forward of moderated message
by openbsc-bounces＠lists.gnumonks.org 18 Sep '10

18 Sep '10

1 0

Using two nanoBTS at the same time (as neighbor)
by Luca Bertoncello 18 Sep '10

18 Sep '10

Hi, list! I'm trying to configure OpenBSC to use two nanoBTS (DSC1800) as neighbor cells. What I'd like to have is, by the measurement report, to get the values of both cells. Can someone say me, how can I configure the two nanoBTS as neighbor? Thanks a lot! -- _______________________________________________________________________ Luca Bertoncello Entwicklung Mail: bertoncello(a)netzing.de NETZING Solutions AG Tel.: 0351/41381 - 23 Fröbelstr. 57, 01159 Dresden Fax: 0351/41381 - 12 _______________________________________________________________________ Impressum: NETZING Solutions AG - Fröbelstraße 57 - 01159 Dresden Sitz der Gesellschaft Amtsgericht Dresden HRB 18926 Vorstand Dieter Schneider - Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender Volker Kanitz USt.Id DE211326547 Mail: netzing.ag(a)netzing.de

2 1

[PATCH] count sms delivery attempts
by Nico Golde 16 Sep '10

16 Sep '10

Hi, attached is a small patch to add sms delivery attempt counting using the db_sms_inc_deliver_attempts() that already existed. I was a bit unsure what exactly counts as a delivery attempt judging by GSM 04.11 but it made sense to me to count that with each CP-DATA. Cheers Nico

2 1

[PATCH] gsm_04_11: count SMS delivery attempts for each CP-DATA
by Nico Golde 15 Sep '10

15 Sep '10

--- openbsc/src/gsm_04_11.c | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/openbsc/src/gsm_04_11.c b/openbsc/src/gsm_04_11.c index 02bc442..4ec1071 100644 --- a/openbsc/src/gsm_04_11.c +++ b/openbsc/src/gsm_04_11.c @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ #include <osmocore/tlv.h> #include <openbsc/debug.h> #include <openbsc/gsm_data.h> +#include <openbsc/db.h> #include <openbsc/gsm_subscriber.h> #include <openbsc/gsm_04_11.h> #include <openbsc/gsm_04_08.h> @@ -175,6 +176,7 @@ static int gsm411_cp_sendmsg(struct msgb *msg, struct gsm_trans *trans, trans->sms.cp_timer.cb = cp_timer_expired; /* 5.3.2.1: Set Timer TC1A */ bsc_schedule_timer(&trans->sms.cp_timer, GSM411_TMR_TC1A); + db_sms_inc_deliver_attempts(trans->sms.sms); DEBUGP(DSMS, "TX: CP-DATA "); break; case GSM411_MT_CP_ACK: -- 1.7.1 --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g--

1 0

alternative hardware
by Hans Witvliet 15 Sep '10

15 Sep '10

Hi all, did anyone allready had the chance to have a look at the magicjack femtocell ? As far as i could see, it has limited capabilities, but at a price of about $200-250 it is tenfold cheaper than ip.access nano-bts. Currently they only speak of support on ms and apple. Even if it would allow a single connection through the guard-band channels, it would be enough for me. hw

4 6

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

OpenBSC