OpenBSC

openbsc@lists.osmocom.org

3 participants
4155 discussions

[ADM] OpenBSC git repository address change

by Harald Welte

Hi all! Today, I have moved the remaining projects on git://openbsc.osmocom.org/ (aka git://bs11-abis.gnumonks.org/) to the central git://git.osmocom.org/ location. This helps us to consolidate all our git repositories on one server. The git URL of the main OpenBSC repository has changed from git://bs11-abis.gnumonks.org/openbsc.git (read-only) gitosis@bs11-abis.gnumonks.org:openbsc.git (write) to git://git.osmocom.org/openbsc.git (read-only) gitosis@git.osmocom.org:openbsc.git (write) In order to update your local repository with the new URL, simply use the "git remote set-url" command, like in the following examples. for those of you with read-only access: git remote set-url origin git://git.osmocom.org/openbsc.git for people with write/commit access: git remote set-url origin gitosis@git.osmocom.org:openbsc.git The other two repositories that have changed in similar way are openggsn.git and chan_openbsc.git. Thanks for your attention, and sorry for any inconvenience, Harald -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

14 years, 6 months

Wireshark Patching...

by Omar Atia

Dear All, Please note that after getting the sources using git , I found wireshark directory contains patches ? I did some googling I found that if I need to patch wireshark I should run like the below command : 1. patch -p1 < patch path/name the configure and compile , but while checking wireshark sources I didn't find for packet-gsm_abis_oml.c in the path of wireshark /epan/dissectors? does the patch abis_oml.patch(available under wireshark directory with the delivery downloaded with git) create it ? Thanks, Omar Atia

14 years, 6 months

IPA Stream IDs

by Holger Hans Peter Freyther

Hi all, I was very liberal in just using numbers from the 'open' number range. We should move to a different scheme and just take the liberty to take one ID and then have our own header inside there. I would propose to do something like this struct ipa_proto_hdr { uint16_t len; uint8_t proto; data[0]; } packed; struct osmo_ipa_proto_hdr { uint8_t osmo_proto; data[0]; } packed;. Any comments?

14 years, 6 months

Connecting to real MSC...

by Omar Atia

Dear All, Can you advise how I could make connections to real MSCs from Openbsc ? Is it supported by OpenBSC? I believe it is over A protocol right ? SCCP ? Thanks, Omar Atia

14 years, 6 months

Re: Who has a nanoBTS for sale?

by Martin Mayoral Zuloaga

I have 2 nanobts for sale. Are you interesting

14 years, 6 months

RE: Relicensing OpenBSC under AGPLv3

by mosbah abdelkader

Can you explain please why you are changing the license. thks. On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:04 PM, <openbsc-request(a)lists.gnumonks.org> wrote: > Send OpenBSC mailing list submissions to > openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.gnumonks.org/mailman/listinfo/openbsc > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > openbsc-request(a)lists.gnumonks.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > openbsc-owner(a)lists.gnumonks.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of OpenBSC digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) (Holger Hans Peter Freyther) > 2. Relicensing OpenBSC under AGPLv3 (Harald Welte) > 3. RE: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) (Omar Atia) > 4. RE: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) (Omar Atia) > 5. RE: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) (Omar Atia) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 10:57:43 +0100 > From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther <holger(a)freyther.de> > Subject: Re: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) > To: Omar Atia <omar.atia(a)its.ws> > Cc: openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org > Message-ID: <4D1EFA97.2010208(a)freyther.de> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On 01/01/2011 10:28 AM, Omar Atia wrote: > > Dear Holger, > > > > I will try to make it on Linux (Home PC), but for the time being solaries > is the OS available for me . > > > > Sorry, > > you really need to find Solaris support in some other channel (no idea > where > this should be). > > z. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 18:19:01 +0100 > From: Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> > Subject: Relicensing OpenBSC under AGPLv3 > To: openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org > Message-ID: <20110101171901.GM23146(a)prithivi.gnumonks.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Hi all, > > Following-up to the previous discussion in May 2009, I have finally changed > the > OpenBSC (and related software) license from GPLv2-or-later to > AGPLv3-or-later. > > All copyright holders have been contacted and all agree on the change of > the > license. > > libosmocore will remain GPLv2-or-later, and if linked with OpenBSC, you > will > use the AGPLv3 compatible GPLv3 license. > > Regards, > Harald > -- > - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> > http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ > > ============================================================================ > "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." > (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6) > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 11:28:47 +0200 > From: Omar Atia <omar.atia(a)its.ws> > Subject: RE: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) > To: 'Holger Hans Peter Freyther' <holger(a)freyther.de>, > openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org > Message-ID: <000201cba996$4d6a9410$e83fbc30$%atia(a)its.ws> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Dear Holger, > > I will try to make it on Linux (Home PC), but for the time being solaries > is the OS available for me . > > 2nd I have found success in compiling sqlite3 and created 3 libs file and > put them under > > root@ITSHPS # cd /usr/lib/dbd or /usr/local/lib/dbd > root@ITSHPS # ls -ltr > total 56 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 31520 Jan 1 11:15 libdbdsqlite3 > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 942 Jan 1 11:15 libdbdsqlite3.la > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 24532 Jan 1 11:15 libdbdsqlite3.a > > Is it necessary to have the shared library as driver I mean is it > obligatory to have libdbdsqlite3.a and libdbdsqlite3.so ? > > Kindly check that folder under your linux path and let me know because I'm > still getting same message when running bsc_hack. > > [ITSHPS]celtabs:/oradata/u01/celtabs/openbsc/openbsc/openbsc/src>./bsc_hack > -c openbsc.cfg.nanobts > <0012> db.c:192 Failed to create connection. > DB: Failed to init database. Please check the option settings. > > > > Please check the below link it contains the so file ... > > http://packages.debian.org/lenny/sparc/libdbd-sqlite3/filelist > > > Thanks,, > Omar Atia > > -----Original Message----- > From: openbsc-bounces(a)lists.gnumonks.org [mailto: > openbsc-bounces(a)lists.gnumonks.org] On Behalf Of Holger Hans Peter > Freyther > Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 12:39 AM > To: openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org > Subject: Re: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) > > On 12/31/2010 11:32 PM, Omar Atia wrote: > > Dear holger, > > > > > so now I have framework installed and I have the sources for the > libdbdsqlite3 but I'm not able to compile , it is writing make statements > without compiling ... > > > > search for *** in the output. it is an indication of (GNU) make that there > is > an error. Most likely the configure script told you it couldn't find the > sqlite3.h and that the SQLIte3 backend was disabled or you need to pass > --enable-sqlite3 when configuring the drivers. > > Is there a strong reason to use Solaris? If there is not strong reason to > use > it you might be more happy with a Linux System as it comes with an easy way > to > install all these dependencies. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 11:56:43 +0200 > From: Omar Atia <omar.atia(a)its.ws> > Subject: RE: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) > To: 'Holger Hans Peter Freyther' <holger(a)freyther.de> > Cc: openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org > Message-ID: <000301cba99a$349615a0$9dc240e0$%atia(a)its.ws> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > It works dear , shared library was missing during compilation :) ...sorry > > -----Original Message----- > From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther [mailto:holger@freyther.de] > Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 11:58 AM > To: Omar Atia > Cc: openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org > Subject: Re: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) > > On 01/01/2011 10:28 AM, Omar Atia wrote: > > Dear Holger, > > > > I will try to make it on Linux (Home PC), but for the time being solaries > is the OS available for me . > > > > Sorry, > > you really need to find Solaris support in some other channel (no idea > where > this should be). > > z. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 00:01:41 +0200 > From: Omar Atia <omar.atia(a)its.ws> > Subject: RE: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) > To: 'Omar Atia' <omar.atia(a)its.ws>, 'Holger Hans Peter Freyther' > <holger(a)freyther.de> > Cc: openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org > Message-ID: <000701cba9ff$7ac0c740$704255c0$%atia(a)its.ws> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Dear Holger? > > > > Also attached screen shot for the telnet to bsc_hack as well as running the > program for sure I still have to bring ipaccess nanoBTS: > > > > Do you have documentation for sample vty commands ? how to provisin > subscriber ? bulk provisining for example ? or needs a script to write them > to DB in bulk mode ? another question is can we use oracle or we need to > redesign the application (db.c) , I saw some commented line for mysql ? > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Omar Atia [mailto:omar.atia@its.ws] > Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 11:57 AM > To: 'Holger Hans Peter Freyther' > Cc: 'openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org' > Subject: RE: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) > > > > It works dear , shared library was missing during compilation :) ...sorry > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther [mailto:holger@freyther.de] > > Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 11:58 AM > > To: Omar Atia > > Cc: openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org > > Subject: Re: OpenBSC on Solaris (Sqlite3) > > > > On 01/01/2011 10:28 AM, Omar Atia wrote: > > > Dear Holger, > > > > > > I will try to make it on Linux (Home PC), but for the time being solaries > is the OS available for me . > > > > > > > Sorry, > > > > you really need to find Solaris support in some other channel (no idea > where > > this should be). > > > > z. > >

14 years, 6 months

RFC: Relicensing OpenBSC under AGPLv3

by Harald Welte

Hi all! This subject came to my attention again recently: Why not relicense OpenBSC under AGPLv3? Right now we are licensing under GPLv2+ (v2 or any later version). However, if an operator was to make lots of private modifications and then operate it on his own network, there would be no distribution and thus no need for him to release his modified versions of the source code. This may sound a bit strange to those who have been with the project since its early days. But we are reaching production quality now, and we already have the first number of production deployments of the software. Companies like Netzing and On-waves have been FOSS-friendly and funding parts of our development effort. They have no issues with the result being Free Software again. However, there are definitely other companies out there who are less fond of sharing... So thus my idea is to put OpenBSC under AGPLv3. This way whoever uses OpenBSC _in modified form_ to operate a communications network will have to provide the source code to that modified form on a network server at no charge. The only controversial question to me is "your modified version must prominently offer all users interacting with it remotely through a computer network (if your version supports such interaction) an opportunity to receive the Corresponding Source". 1) does a gsm network count as computer network? i'd say yes. 2) is using a gsm network 'interacting with it remotely'? I'd also say yes 3) what does 'prominently offer' mean in the context of GSM? We don't want the operator to spam their users with advertisement SMS just to know that they can get the soruce code, after all. Notwithstanding those open questions, such a network operator would always have the option of simply sending back his changes for integration in the official project - and thus he would no longer use a modified version which then means there is no need for the prominent notice / download at all. We can make this very clear in the project documentation, putting further encouragement The actual relicensing should be less problematic than I thought, since AGPLv3 is compatible with GPLv3. So I could re-license all parts that I own copyright on (which should be the majority of the code base anyway) under AGPLv3, while the former GPLv2+ components (like VTY code from zebra, or contributions by other people) then become GPLv3-or-later. Of course I would want to encourage all developers/contributors to also follow the re-licensing. Particularly Holger Freyther, Dieter Spaar, Andreas Eversberg, Jan Luebbe, Sylvain Munaut, Daniel Willmann, Stefan Schmidt. So let's start with a poll: a) Do you think re-licensing to AGPLv3 is a good idea? b) If you have contributed, would you re-license your code under AGPLv3? If we have some kind of concesus in the community, I would approach On-waves whether they would want to do the same for their share of the copyright. As their "modifications" are all part of OpenBSC git repository, they would not be subject to any different conditions than before. Thanks in advance for your feedback, Harald -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

14 years, 6 months

Re: OpenBSC on Solaris (WAS: Re: Notes from the 27C3 network)

by Dieter Spaar

Hello Holger, On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:24:41 +0100, "Holger Hans Peter Freyther" <holger(a)freyther.de> wrote: > > If that is set on the socket for the telnet interface it does make a difference. Just in case, Cygwin also misses cfmakeraw(), my private modification for this is the following which is of course the same you quoted from the man page. #if defined(__CYGWIN__) /* Workaround for Cygwin, which is missing cfmakeraw */ /* Pasted from man page */ void cfmakeraw(struct termios *termios_p) { termios_p->c_iflag &= ~(IGNBRK|BRKINT|PARMRK|ISTRIP|INLCR|IGNCR|ICRNL|IXON); termios_p->c_oflag &= ~OPOST; termios_p->c_lflag &= ~(ECHO|ECHONL|ICANON|ISIG|IEXTEN); termios_p->c_cflag &= ~(CSIZE|PARENB); termios_p->c_cflag |= CS8; } #endif /* defined(__CYGWIN__) */ Maybe there is a Solaris-specific preprocessor symbol and we can add this function to an appropriate place. Best regards, Dieter -- Dieter Spaar, Germany spaar(a)mirider.augusta.de

14 years, 6 months

Notes from the 27C3 network

by Holger Hans Peter Freyther

Hi all, here are some notes about bsc_hack as it ran on the 27C3. In day0 we discovered a nice SQL injection bug, in day1 we had plenty of segfaults, mostly in the error and time-out paths of the MSC (but also some in the BSC API). These included crashes due clearing the channel and removing the ->lchan from the conn, RLL time out handling in the SMS code and some more. The network ran without segfault (only one crash due my stupidity on a new VTY command) after this. The biggest issue as that SMS got stuck. Code review has found some issues immediately but this didn't fix it. On more code review an issue with the 'subscr_get_channel' was identified. First of all the transaction layer just stopped paging requests, e.g. stopping the paging for someone else's subscr_get_channel, then the Call Control code never called subscr_put_channel when it is done. I have created two band aids for this situation but there is a bigger issue with the code. If somebody has spare time and wants to do some simple changes one can do: 1.) The subscriber layer passes the 'subscr' pointer to the paging layer, it should pass the request to it. 2.) It should be possible to cancel channel requests that were not scheduled yet. 3.) Once we started auth on the channel the 'request' state should be changed too. It is not right now due 1.). 4.) ....

14 years, 6 months

AW: OpenBSC Digest, Vol 24, Issue 26

by Lud Gidiya

--- openbsc-request(a)lists.gnumonks.org <openbsc-request(a)lists.gnumonks.org> schrieb am Mo, 27.12.2010: Von: openbsc-request(a)lists.gnumonks.org <openbsc-request(a)lists.gnumonks.org> Betreff: OpenBSC Digest, Vol 24, Issue 26 An: openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org Datum: Montag, 27. Dezember, 2010 13:00 Uhr Send OpenBSC mailing list submissions to openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.gnumonks.org/mailman/listinfo/openbsc or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to openbsc-request(a)lists.gnumonks.org You can reach the person managing the list at openbsc-owner(a)lists.gnumonks.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of OpenBSC digest..." Today's Topics: 1. RE: OpenBSC+LCR+Asterisk installation problem (Caleb Pal) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 14:41:39 -0800 From: "Caleb Pal" <cleb(a)defcon-3.net> Subject: RE: OpenBSC+LCR+Asterisk installation problem To: "'jason mercury'" <jmercury313(a)gmail.com>, <openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org> Message-ID: <004901cba54e$0ffe0950$2ffa1bf0$@net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Are you using Asterisk 1.8? If so, you should checkout the asterisk_1_8 branch of LCR. LCR git was down, it is now back up at a slightly different location, git://git.misdn.org/lcr.git/. mISDN and mISDNuser git are also at the new path. HTH, Caleb From: openbsc-bounces(a)lists.gnumonks.org [mailto:openbsc-bounces@lists.gnumonks.org] On Behalf Of jason mercury Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 8:15 AM To: openbsc(a)lists.gnumonks.org Subject: OpenBSC+LCR+Asterisk installation problem Hi, I am trying to install a OpenBSC+LCR+Asterisk system according to the how to send to the mail list by Konrad Meier on Tue Oct 12 18:27:33 2010. During installation of LCR I got following error: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/idb/openbsc/lcr' gcc -DWITH_GSM_BS -I./openbsc/include -I./libosmocore/include -I./openbsc -Wall -DCONFIG_DATA="\"/usr/local/lcr\"" -DSHARE_DATA="\"/usr/local/lcr\"" -DLOG_DIR="\"/usr/local/lcr\"" -DEXTENSION_DATA="\"/usr/local/lcr/extensions\"" -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -c chan_lcr.c -o chan_lcr.po chan_lcr.c: In function 'lcr_indicate': chan_lcr.c:2274: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type chan_lcr.c:2289: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type chan_lcr.c:2316: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type chan_lcr.c:2381: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type chan_lcr.c:2382: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type chan_lcr.c: In function 'load_module': chan_lcr.c:2818: warning: passing argument 2 of 'ast_register_application2' from incompatible pointer type /usr/include/asterisk/module.h:427: note: expected 'int (*)(struct ast_channel *, void *)' but argument is of type 'int (*)(struct ast_channel *, void *)' make[1]: *** [chan_lcr.po] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/idb/openbsc/lcr' make: *** [all] Error 2 Why is this occur? My ubuntu kernel is 2.6.32-24-generic and i exactly followed the steps. I am attaching that how to again. I also couldn't git check out OpenBSC, LCR , mISDN, mISDNuser and i download them from http://www.linux-call-router.de/download/lcr-1.7/. I want to ask that why i can't git clone. When i try to git clone i take following: git clone git://git.misdn.org/git/lcr.git/ Initialized empty Git repository in /home/idb/op/lcr/.git/ fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly If any you have idea please help. Thanks. Jason.

14 years, 6 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

OpenBSC