Hi all,
After buying a super Sim Kit (16 in 1) from China, I tried the reader (green PCB inside a blue transparent plastic case with a blue LED) and SIM (identified as a fakesupersim) with pysim tool. However i am getting the following error:
/pySim-prog.py -n 26C3 -c 49 -x 262 -y 42 -z 1234 -j 1 -t auto
Insert card now (or CTRL-C to cancel)
Autodetected card type fakemagicsim
Generated card parameters :
> Name : 26C3
> SMSP : e1ffffffffffffffffffffffff058100945555ffffffffffff000000
> ICCID : 8949262427518313026
> MCC/MNC : 262/42
> IMSI : 262422461512085
> Ki : 7b74741a1ee14337ec23f9ab92a13648
> OPC : ccd867d60797d8d45354a51b3ef568ff
Programming ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./pySim-prog.py", line 530, in <module>
card.program(cp)
File "/home/nadicek/pysim/pysim/pySim/cards.py", line 231, in program
self._scc.update_binary('6f30', hplmn + 'ff' * (tl-3))
File "/home/nadicek/pysim/pysim/pySim/commands.py", line 53, in update_binary
return self._tp.send_apdu_checksw(pdu)
File "/home/nadicek/pysim/pysim/pySim/transport/__init__.py", line 87, in send_apdu_checksw
raise RuntimeError("SW match failed ! Expected %s and got %s." % (sw.lower(), rv[1]))
RuntimeError: SW match failed ! Expected 9000 and got 9804.
I checked mailing lists and haven’t found anybody who had similar problem with pysim. Also I have tried forcing different models of SIM, but nothing is working. Obviously I can remove this check from the script file (__init__.py in /pySim/transport), however somebody had a reason to put such condition there. I would like to ask if it is safe to remove that line of code and the purpose of that line of code.
Thanks a lot and best regards
Martin
> I don't understand. This callback will be called with data you need to
write
> to the network. In case of MTP Level3 you will need to wrap that around
the
> msgb you got.
I means: is the interaction with mtp3 layer implemented (is sending sccp
data by mtp3 implemented by the library?)?
Also, what about the reception of data from mtp3 layer. is that implemented
in the sccp lib.
I am asking these questions because I see the code of mtp3 in the lib but no
significant call is present in the sccp part of the lib.
Thank you for your help.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:05:28AM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> [translated from german]
> is it certain that we switch a channel to PDCH only when
> gprs mode != none?
A TS can be GSM_PCHAN_TCH_F_PDCH; those are the only ones for which we
send a PDCH ACT message.
We send a PDCH ACT message
- during init (CHANNEL OML's state changed to enabled -> send PDCH ACT),
- and upon channel release ack when pchan == GSM_PCHAN_TCH_F_PDCH.
So the question is, when we receive a channel release ack, could that be
the PDCH release and we switch PDCH right back on by accident? No, because
we only receive a chan rel ack when the *TCH/F* is being released.
That is because the PDCH release is initiated "internally" from the PDCH
DEACT, and thus this condition in common/rsl.c rsl_tx_rf_rel_ack() catches
on, which existed before dyn PDCH:
if (lchan->rel_act_kind != LCHAN_REL_ACT_RSL) {
LOGP(DRSL, LOGL_NOTICE, "%s not sending REL ACK\n",
gsm_lchan_name(lchan));
return 0;
}
In rsl_rx_rf_chan_rel() the rel_act_kind is set to LCHAN_REL_ACT_RSL, but
not in the rsl_rx_dyn_pdch().
This is analogous to the ip.access way -- the ip.access nanobts replies to
a PDCH DEACT with a PDCH DEACT ACK and doesn't send a separate channel
release ack.
Maybe we could set rel_act_kind to some new LCHAN_REL_ACT_IPAC_DYN_PDCH
for clarity? (But we shouldn't actually send a release ack, to stay
compatible.)
Even though it works as-is, we should indeed add another flag check:
- We do check the flags that no ACT/DEACT is already pending;
- And we do send a PDCH DEACT only if ts->flags & TS_F_PDCH_ACTIVE;
- But we would send a PDCH ACT despite ts->flags & TS_F_PDCH_ACTIVE.
This should never happen, but it would make sense to ensure that.
~Neels
Hi,
My name is Brackley Cassinga Form DRC, we run a community network called
pamoja net where we offer gsm services using osmocom open source software
and OC Base station.
Recently I have tried to install another base station as the same installed
but I could not find any resource guiding through all the steps to take to
run NIB on a base station.
I'm currently running Ubuntu and I will appreciate if you could guide me on
the installation of BSC,hlr,MSC , in order to run a basic gsm network.
Thank you. Regards
--
*Ir Brackley heshima Casinga **Pacifique*
*CEO and Founder of kwanzatechnologie*
KwanzaTechnologies ,GlobalElectronics
+243977265291 | +243977265291 | Pcassinga(a)gmail.com/
brackley(a)ensemblepourladifference.org
www.kwantechnologies.jimdosite.com <http://www.kwantechnologies.com/> |
Skype: Brackley cassinga <https://webapp.wisestamp.com/#>
Av Semliki N 43
Hi all,
What are the plans to expand support for new SDR devices?
When I check the contents of osmo-trx/Transceiver52M/device/ on the git
master I see the supported lms, uhd and usrp1 devices. For example the XTRX
SDR was presented at OsmoDevCon 2018. I expected it to be included in the
master soon. At this point I see its addition in the fairwaves /
libxtrx-wip branch from 2018. That doesn't give me much encouragement for
my next question.
Would it be possible to add support for PCIe SDR from Amarisoft?
Some information about SDR is here
https://discourse.myriadrf.org/t/amarisoft-sdr-integration-with-oai/2288
Based on the
https://media.ccc.de/v/osmocon2018-82-osmotrx-status-support-for-more-drive…
I tried to create support by myself. I've gotten into a state that some MS
with weak requirements for signal quality and timing can connect. My branch
is here https://github.com/XK1ZU/osmo-trx/tree/PCIeSDR-LMSstyle
gr-osmosdr support is here
https://github.com/XK1ZU/gr-osmosdr/commits/PCIeSDR
This osmo-trx is able to run for a few tens of seconds then it quits and I
have to restart it, so I would need a deeper understanding of the timing
and scheduling of processes within osmo-trx. Who should be a clock master
SW stack or SDR device?
I see a lot of log error messages as
0000> Transceiver.cpp:422 [tid=140137319651072][chan=0] dumping STALE burst
in TRX->SDR interface (1:1408722 vs 7:1408723), retrans=0
<0000> Transceiver.cpp:1122 [tid=140137311258368] ClockInterface: sending
IND CLOCK 1408899
or
0000> Transceiver.cpp:280 [tid=140137328043776] Starting the transceiver
<0000> radioInterface.cpp:181 [tid=140137328043776] Starting radio device
<0000> PCIESDRDevice.cpp:199 [tid=140137328043776] PCIESDRDevice::start
<0000> PCIESDRDevice.cpp:205 [tid=140137328043776] starting PCIeSDR...,
sample rate:1.08333e+06
<0000> PCIESDRDevice.cpp:234 [tid=140137328043776] PCIESDRDevice::flush
<0000> PCIESDRDevice.cpp:219 [tid=140137328043776] msdr_start ok:
<0000> PCIESDRDevice.cpp:532 [tid=140137328043776] Update Alignment
<0000> PCIESDRDevice.cpp:532 [tid=140137328043776] Update Alignment
<0000> radioInterface.cpp:202 [tid=140137328043776] Radio started
<0000> Threads.cpp:119 [tid=140137294472960] Thread 140137294472960 (task
18522) set name: TxLower
<0000> Threads.cpp:119 [tid=140137311258368] Thread 140137311258368 (task
18524) set name: RxUpper0
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:923 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] response is 'RSP
POWERON 0'
<0000> Threads.cpp:119 [tid=140137302865664] Thread 140137302865664 (task
18523) set name: RxLower
<0002> PCIESDRDevice.cpp:363 [tid=140137302865664] rc < 0
<0002> PCIESDRDevice.cpp:364 [tid=140137302865664] Sample buffer: Requested
timestamp is not valid
<0000> Threads.cpp:119 [tid=140137319651072] Thread 140137319651072 (task
18525) set name: TxUpper0
<0002> PCIESDRDevice.cpp:365 [tid=140137302865664] timestamp = 10960,
length = 262144, time_start = 6765960, time_end = 6766960, data_start =
223320, data_end = 224320
<0002> PCIESDRDevice.cpp:482 [tid=140137294472960] tx_underflow_count:3
rx_overflow_count:0
<0002> PCIESDRDevice.cpp:491 [tid=140137294472960] PCIeSDR: tx underrun
ts_tmp:10976 ts:10960 hwts:6762040
<0000> radioInterface.cpp:334 [tid=140137302865664] Receive error 0
<0000> Transceiver.cpp:1162 [tid=140137302865664] Something went wrong in
thread RxLower, requesting stop
<0002> PCIESDRDevice.cpp:482 [tid=140137294472960] tx_underflow_count:4
rx_overflow_count:0
<0002> PCIESDRDevice.cpp:491 [tid=140137294472960] PCIeSDR: tx underrun
ts_tmp:13476 ts:13460 hwts:6762278
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:778 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] command is
'SETRXGAIN 40'
<0000> PCIESDRDevice.cpp:318 [tid=140137328043776] Setting RX gain to 40 dB.
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:923 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] response is 'RSP
SETRXGAIN 0 40'
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:778 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] command is
'SETPOWER 0'
<0000> PCIESDRDevice.cpp:297 [tid=140137328043776] Setting TX gain to 60
dB. device:0x1f6e0e0 chan:0
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:923 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] response is 'RSP
SETPOWER 0 0'
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:778 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] command is
'SETSLOT 0 5'
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:923 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] response is 'RSP
SETSLOT 0 0 5'
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:778 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] command is
'SETSLOT 1 7'
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:923 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] response is 'RSP
SETSLOT 0 1 7'
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:778 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] command is
'SETSLOT 2 13'
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:923 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] response is 'RSP
SETSLOT 0 2 13'
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:778 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] command is
'SETSLOT 3 13'
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:923 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] response is 'RSP
SETSLOT 0 3 13'
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:778 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] command is
'SETSLOT 4 13'
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:923 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] response is 'RSP
SETSLOT 0 4 13'
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:778 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] command is
'SETSLOT 5 8'
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:923 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] response is 'RSP
SETSLOT 0 5 8'
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:778 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] command is
'SETSLOT 6 8'
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:923 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] response is 'RSP
SETSLOT 0 6 8'
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:778 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] command is
'SETSLOT 5 13'
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:923 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] response is 'RSP
SETSLOT 0 5 13'
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:778 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] command is
'SETSLOT 7 13'
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:923 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] response is 'RSP
SETSLOT 0 7 13'
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:778 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] command is
'SETSLOT 6 13'
<0001> Transceiver.cpp:923 [tid=140137328043776][chan=0] response is 'RSP
SETSLOT 0 6 13'
<0000> osmo-trx.cpp:485 [tid=140137400406720] Shutting down transceiver...
<0000> Transceiver.cpp:338 [tid=140137400406720] Stopping the transceiver
<0000> Transceiver.cpp:351 [tid=140137400406720] Stopping the device
<0000> PCIESDRDevice.cpp:254 [tid=140137400406720] PCIESDRDevice::stop
<0000> PCIESDRDevice.cpp:261 [tid=140137400406720] PCIESDR stopped
<0000> Transceiver.cpp:364 [tid=140137400406720] Transceiver stopped
<0000> PCIESDRDevice.cpp:78 [tid=140137400406720] Closing PCIESDR Device
Yours XK1Zu
Hi all,
it has been coming up in at least two contexts recently: Select is showing
up a lot in system-level profiles particularly on osmo-bts.
This is hardly surprising, as select() is not particularly known for
efficiency. It was used back in 2008 for the *BSC*, in a context where
we were talking about 1-10 BTS with each no more than 1-2 TRX. Now we
are using the same osmo_fd abstraction on the BTS, where the number of
messages per second is much higher, particularly in osmo-bts-trx with
its TRXD protocol, and particularly with higher number of TRX per BTS.
There is an older feature request to introduce epoll support in https://osmocom.org/issues/1579
but unfortunately nobody has been finding the resources and/or time to
implement it.
Meanwhile, 1.5 years ago, the Linux kernel received a new sub-system
called io_uring, which I would personally love to support. Here are some
pointers for those who are interested:
https://lwn.net/Articles/776703/https://kernel.dk/io_uring.pdfhttps://lwn.net/Kernel/Index/#io_uring
As unfortunately not everyone is using half-way recent kernels, we will
likely have to fall back to epoll or something like that.
Regards,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)osmocom.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
There is an urgent need to migrate our most important public
infrastructure to a new server, and I will be doing that on
*Sunday, July 19 2020*, starting about 9am CEST.
The migration involves redmine (main osmocom.org website), jenkins, gerrit,
git, and cgit.
In theory, the migration should be quick. I would expect (significantly)
less than one hour of downtime. However, we all know Murphys law.
Services not affected are mail (including mailman lists), ftp, dns. So in case
of doubt, we can still use mailing lists to communicate.
In case anyone urgently needs osmocom source code on Sunday morning
during the downtime: There are public mirrors available on github.
Regards,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)osmocom.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
Hi all,
Just wondering what the status of OsmoCBC is?
I started compiling from source, but I couldn't find any docs on
interfacing with it other than that it's via a HTTP REST API,
If there aren't any docs are there packet captures or examples I can work
from that'd be quicker than trying to reverse it from the source code,
Happy to contribute some docs once I work it out,
Cheers,
Nick
