7 Feb
2011
7 Feb
'11
8:17 p.m.
Hi,
I've been playing with Dahdi and OpenBSC (I have an old T100P card) and
something I'm a little confused about is what is the proper configuration
for system.conf?
Does dahdi itself take care of the hdlc/lapd signalling (in which case I'd
expect the signalling channel to be set as dchan in
/etc/dahdi/system.conf) or is openbsc taking care of the hdlc/lapd
signalling (in which case I'd expect the signalling channel to be set as
clear)?
Thanks,
Gus Bourg
7 Feb
7 Feb
9:45 p.m.
Dahdi takes care of the signalling, in a manner of speaking.
For OpenBSC, the signalling channel should be a "dchan".
Matthew Fredrickson
Digium, Inc.
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Gus Bourg <gus(a)bourg.net> wrote:
Hi,
I've been playing with Dahdi and OpenBSC (I have an old T100P card) and
something I'm a little confused about is what is the proper configuration
for system.conf?
Does dahdi itself take care of the hdlc/lapd signalling (in which case I'd
expect the signalling channel to be set as dchan in /etc/dahdi/system.conf)
or is openbsc taking care of the hdlc/lapd signalling (in which case I'd
expect the signalling channel to be set as clear)?
Thanks,
Gus Bourg
8 Feb
8 Feb
7:25 p.m.
Hi!
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 07:17:50PM +0000, Gus Bourg wrote:
Does dahdi itself take care of the hdlc/lapd
signalling (in which
case I'd expect the signalling channel to be set as dchan in
/etc/dahdi/system.conf) or is openbsc taking care of the hdlc/lapd
signalling (in which case I'd expect the signalling channel to be
set as clear)?
Normally you'd do HDLC inside DAHDI and do LAPD inside OpenBSC.
This is what happens if you do 'dchan=1'.
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
5247
days inactive
5248
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Gus Bourg -
Harald Welte -
Matthew Fredrickson