Hi all,
I was very liberal in just using numbers from the 'open' number range. We should move to a different scheme and just take the liberty to take one ID and then have our own header inside there.
I would propose to do something like this
struct ipa_proto_hdr { uint16_t len; uint8_t proto; data[0]; } packed;
struct osmo_ipa_proto_hdr { uint8_t osmo_proto; data[0]; } packed;.
Any comments?
Hi,
I was very liberal in just using numbers from the 'open' number range.
huh ? Where do you do that ?
I would propose to do something like this
struct ipa_proto_hdr { uint16_t len; uint8_t proto; data[0]; } packed;
struct osmo_ipa_proto_hdr { uint8_t osmo_proto; data[0]; } packed;
looks like a sane idea to me. Plus it makes the header 32 bits ...
Sylvain
On 01/06/2011 01:20 PM, Sylvain Munaut wrote:
Hi,
I was very liberal in just using numbers from the 'open' number range.
huh ? Where do you do that ?
I tunnel MGCP through the protocol, we work on a interface to access statistics and set some other things that will work through the protocol as well. Right now I will have to tunnel ISUP messages as well.