Hi Neels, On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 03:54:40AM +0200, Neels Hofmeyr wrote: I think in general we should not fall into that trap. We have *no clue* at all who might be using libosmo* for whatever purpose. If we provide a libary with a given API/ABI, then it's our responsibility to keep that ABI/API as stable as possible. I understand that it was hardly possible without fall-out in that particular case, and for sure there are exceptions. However, completely unrelated to this particular topic (and hence the Cc to openbsc@) I'm not happy in general with the way how "carlessly" we sometimes introduce breakage. We have to be more disciplined in general on this. All of us. BTW: The fact that this change has gone into master without being noticed also means that possibly we're not modelling osmocom-bb as a downstream user of libosmocore that needs to be rebuilt (and at least checked if it starts up correctly?) whenever testing a libosmocore change. That's also something to investigate. Maybe there's some way we can test this without too much effort. Regards, Harald -- - Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)