i just want to know, if my recent patch arrived on this list (my last mail), because my first mail formatting was detected as spam. i see no reaction to my last mail.
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 15:25:59 Andreas.Eversberg wrote:
i just want to know, if my recent patch arrived on this list (my last mail), because my first mail formatting was detected as spam. i see no reaction to my last mail.
Yes, I waited for Harald to respond as he is the boss. My taste regarding patches is very special and I prefer the smaller patches... e.g. I would like to have separate patches for things like LAC, auto release of layer2, and it is hard for me to judge the actual mISDN changes as you are the expert there. One thing that is clearly missing is an updated configure.in to check for the mISDNuser header files and fail when they are not there and is it really necessary to invoke init_af_isdn()? Where is this coming from?
I will probably/hopefully merge your: - LAC - Card NR - autorelease
patches, the e1 changes look sensible too but I need to test them on a bs11.
z.
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 15:44:44 Holger Freyther wrote:
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 15:25:59 Andreas.Eversberg wrote:
i just want to know, if my recent patch arrived on this list (my last mail), because my first mail formatting was detected as spam. i see no reaction to my last mail.
Yes, I waited for Harald to respond as he is the boss. My taste regarding patches is very special and I prefer the smaller patches... e.g. I would like to have separate patches for things like LAC, auto release of layer2, and it is hard for me to judge the actual mISDN changes as you are the expert there. One thing that is clearly missing is an updated configure.in to check for the mISDNuser header files and fail when they are not there and is it really necessary to invoke init_af_isdn()? Where is this coming from?
I will probably/hopefully merge your:
- LAC
- Card NR
- autorelease
Okay, I managed to do this today. It would be cool if you could split out your improved log messages (__func__) and extended error checking (making sure we have 30 bchan's) into a separate patch and I would be happy to merge this then, afterwards the killing of the usleep should be done.
z.
Hello,
I finally got time to try out my BTS. When I looked at the LMT I was confused about the "MBCCU0: No Load" which seems to be the TRX0 ? Ive already changed the TEI to 25. What I always get is the Abis-Link: Restoring message on LMT. Seems to be the "If you see any other difference (i.e. not reaching Phase 3 Normal or no MBCCU0 Load) please contact the openbsc@lists.gnumonks.org mailinglist with the full details. " problem ;) .
So can anybody help?
Here the boot-up:
LMT LOGON: ACK
PHASE: 1 Warm Up Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Warm Up Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Warm Up Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Warm Up Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Warm Up Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Warm Up Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Warm Up Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Warm Up Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Warm Up Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 1 Load SMU Intended Abis-link: Down PHASE: 2 Load MBCCU MBCCU0: No Load MBCCU1: No Load Abis-link: Down PHASE: 2 Load MBCCU MBCCU0: Load BTSCAC MBCCU1: No Load Abis-link: Down PHASE: 2 Load MBCCU MBCCU0: Load BTSCAC MBCCU1: Load BTSCAC Abis-link: Down PHASE: 2 Load MBCCU MBCCU0: No Load MBCCU1: Load BTSCAC Abis-link: Down PHASE: 2 Load MBCCU MBCCU0: No Load MBCCU1: Load BTSCAC Abis-link: Down PHASE: 2 Load MBCCU MBCCU0: No Load MBCCU1: Load BTSDRX Abis-link: Down PHASE: 2 Load MBCCU MBCCU0: No Load MBCCU1: Load BTSBBX Abis-link: Down PHASE: 2 Load MBCCU MBCCU0: No Load MBCCU1: Load BTSARC Abis-link: Down PHASE: 2 Load MBCCU MBCCU0: No Load MBCCU1: Load BTSARC Abis-link: Down PHASE: 2 Load MBCCU MBCCU0: No Load MBCCU1: Load Abis-link: Down PHASE: 3 Normal MBCCU0: No Load MBCCU1: Load Abis-link: Restoring ^C signal 2 received LMT LOGOFF: ACK
And the query:
gsmbase:/home/tec/openbsc/src# ./bs11_config query bs11_config (C) 2009 by Harald Welte and Dieter Spaar This is FREE SOFTWARE with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY
LMT LOGON: ACK
PHASE: 2 Maintenance MBCCU0: No Load MBCCU1: Load Abis-link: Down
BS11 ATTRIBUTES: BS-11 ESN PCB Serial Number: 001142 BS-11 ESN Hardware Code Number: 135-2044/03.03 BS-11 ESN Firmware Code Number: 135-2044/03.03
SITE MANAGER ATTRIBUTES: E1 Channel: Port=0 Timeslot=1 (Full Slot) TEI: 25
BS11 Power Amplifier 0 ATTRIBUTES: TRX Power: 30mW (GSM)
BS11 Power Amplifier 1 ATTRIBUTES: TRX Power: 30mW (GSM) LMT LOGOFF: ACK
Best regards Björn Heller
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Björn Heller Jabber: tec@jabber.hellercom.de
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:44:44PM +0200, Holger Freyther wrote:
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 15:25:59 Andreas.Eversberg wrote:
i just want to know, if my recent patch arrived on this list (my last mail), because my first mail formatting was detected as spam. i see no reaction to my last mail.
Yes, I waited for Harald to respond as he is the boss.
sorry, I am always under a lot of time constraints, so please don't be surprised if you don't get an immediate response. The lat two days I've been sitting in a room full of 40-or-so lawyers, which is also very exciting and important for Free Software, but doesn't really make me get any code done.
My taste regarding patches is very special and I prefer the smaller patches... e.g. I would like to have separate patches for things like LAC, auto release of layer2,
I agree to that, and I don't think it is special but rather the most common case in Free Software projects, at least all that I have been involed in.
Nonetheless, no need to split up the existing patch by Andreas. But for the future a set of incremental but distinct per-feature patches would probably be better.
I will only be in Berlin next week before departing for Taiwan again. So that last week at home is typically very busy, don't expect me to get much done. I will look into all of Andreas' pending patches and test + apply them as applicable on my BS-11 setup at home.
The good news is: 1) There are now two BS-11 in Taipei that I have to set up (and can use) while being there, so there's no lack of hardware access during the 3 weeks there. 2) I just received news that the nanoBTS 1800 for Dieter and me have arrived.
Regards,
-
Andreas.Eversberg -
Bjoern Heller -
Harald Welte -
Holger Freyther