20 Feb
2014
20 Feb
'14
10:11 a.m.
Hi Jacob,
There are two reasons, why I use == GSM48_MT_RR_IMM_ASS:
- currently IMM.ASS.EXT messages are not used in openbsc
- this code can handle only IMM.ASS messages, because IMM.ASS.EXT
message allocates two channels and we should release these two
channels in this case.
2014-02-20 13:24 GMT+04:00 Jacob Erlbeck <jerlbeck(a)sysmocom.de>de>:
On 20.02.2014 08:28, Ivan Kluchnikov wrote:
--
Regards,
Ivan Kluchnikov.
http://fairwaves.ru
If bsc receives Delete_Ind message from bts, bsc
should release allocated channel, which was specified in dropped imm_assign message.
+/* CCCH is overloaded, IMM_ASSIGN was dropped */
+static int rsl_rx_delete_ind(struct gsm_bts_trx *trx, struct msgb *msg)
+{
[...]
+
+ if (ia->msg_type == GSM48_MT_RR_IMM_ASS) {
Why are you not checking again != GSM48_MT_RR_IMM_ASS_REJ? What's with
the IMM.ASS.EXT messages?
Jacob