Thanks Ivaylo,
A bit of feedback...
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 05:00:03PM +0100, Ivaylo Kostov wrote:
6 TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH (Osmocom style dynamic timeslots) 3 TCH/F, 3 PDCH 3 TCH/H, 3 PDCH 6 TCH/F_PDCH (ip.access style dynamic timeslots)
IMHO it would make sense to group dyn TS, i.e.
3 TCH/F, 3 PDCH 3 TCH/H, 3 PDCH 6 TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH (Osmocom style dynamic timeslots) 6 TCH/F_PDCH (ip.access style dynamic timeslots)
All test cases passed.
This reminds me, maybe we should have a list of "all test cases" on the Osmocom wiki?
immediately after B subscriber accepts the call, when nanoBTS (model 165G) and NITB is configured with dynamic channels: 3 TCH/H and 3 PDCH. Default
3 TCH/H, 3 PDCH is not a dynamic channel configuration.
In general I like the brevity and clarity of the report. Thanks!
~N