Hi Duncan,
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 04:41:38PM -0700, Duncan Smith wrote:
I'm presently attemping to work with the code here: http://cgit.osmocom.org/cgit/erlang.
What exactly are you trying to achieve?
The code is currently not in a state that makes it easy to use for anyone not intimately familiar with it. It's mainly developed to fulfill whatever current (customer) requirement I have, and has many undocumented shortcomings and pitfalls.
I hope it eventually will emerge into something more generalized, but until I get around writing some MAP applications (startin with a HLR), it will probably remain in its current state.
Some of the code is used in production 24/7, a lot of other code has never been running outside of my lab.
Is there something I'm missing? (I just started working with Erlang this week, so I may be missing something completely obvious.) I think the main issue is the makefiles aren't putting generated asn.1 code in places that Erlang expects to see headers and code, and the makefiles don't chain together. :)
Anything but the signerl code is built with rebar, not with make. So I guess if there are still any makefiles, they should be deleted from the tree.