Hi Pau,
For instance in GSM I see RLC/MAC, LLC, SNDCP, etc. but those were never really necessary afaik because they always come on top of Um, which is the protocol we encapsulate with gsmtap.
What Vadim said explains my intention. I want to avoid attaching unneeded pseudo-Um header when only RLC/MAC, LLC, SNDCP, (even RR) PDUs are available.
AFAIU "uint8_t metadata[0];" is where the T16L16V is placed?
Yes, exactly.
Best, Shinjo
2024년 5월 13일 월요일 오전 10시 50분 12초 CEST에 Pau Espin Pedrol 님이 쓴 글:
Hi Sinjo,
I wonder whether we should be allocating gsmtap types for protocols which had to use alone so far. For instance in GSM I see RLC/MAC, LLC, SNDCP, etc. but those were never really necessary afaik because they always come on top of Um, which is the protocol we encapsulate with gsmtap. I understand that somebody may want to encapsulate eg LLC directly, but until there's a explicit need for it I'd perhaps avoid adding them to the list.
AFAIU "uint8_t metadata[0];" is where the T16L16V is placed?
Regards, Pau