14 Feb
2017
14 Feb
'17
6:40 p.m.
Hi Neels,
thanks for outlining the roadmap.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 05:40:01PM +0100, Neels Hofmeyr wrote:
For Iu and A interfaces (a standalone 3G+2G MSC
implementation), we have
also worked towards a complete separation of libmsc from libbsc. As a
result, we will probably completely replace OsmoNITB with the new
OsmoCSCN, meaning "Circuit Switched Core Network"
Originally when we started this 3G related work, CSCN was "NITB without
BSC", i.e. it included SMSC and HLR/AUC functionalities. However, as
the VLR/HLR split is also coming to a close now, I'm not sure if we
shoul continue to call it CSCN, or if we should simply call it "MSC".
The only thing "unusual" for a MSC that it still contains at this point
(when both BSC and HLR/AUC have been moved out) is the SMSC.
So we migh simply move to a NITB that is split up in BSC, MSC/VLR and
HLR/AUC, and call the components OsmoBSC (exists already), OsmoHLR
(exists already) and OsmoMSC (which is still called CSCN). Or we keep
calling it CSCN until the SMS has moved out?
Regards,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)