23 Oct
2014
23 Oct
'14
12:47 p.m.
On Thursday 2014-10-23 14:39, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:24:57AM +0200, ☎ wrote:
Good catch, I didn't notice it. Maybe we should just use size_t for all the length functions in libosmo*? That's what size_t was invented for after all :)
it looks like a candidate for ping-pong games on 32bit/64bit userland on GNU/Linux. What is the type here? unsigned int - size_t?
I can't quote the ISO C specification. So what type is the result of "unsigned int - size_t"?
size_t, because it is of higher rank. (The specifier to use is %zu.)