23 Oct
2014
23 Oct
'14
2:47 p.m.
On Thursday 2014-10-23 14:39, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:24:57AM +0200, ☎ wrote:
size_t, because it is of higher rank.
(The specifier to use is %zu.)
Good catch, I didn't notice it. Maybe we
should just use size_t for all the length
functions in libosmo*? That's what size_t was invented for after all :)
> it looks like a candidate for ping-pong
games on 32bit/64bit userland
> on GNU/Linux. What is the type here? unsigned int - size_t?
I can't quote the ISO C specification. So what type is the result of
"unsigned int - size_t"?