29 Jun
2016
29 Jun
'16
5:42 p.m.
Hi Neels,
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 06:10:51PM +0200, Neels Hofmeyr wrote:
I notice that apparently osmo-bts-trx is the only
caller of the trx_sched_*
API, yet it is implemented in common/scheduler.c and compiled to
libl1sched.a. Is osmo-bts-trx really the only caller?
Yes.
Also in osmo-bts-trx, the "trx" to me means
SDR, like B200.
But any BTS has one or more TRXs. So why isn't it osmo-bts-sdr?
In osmo-bts-trx, "TRX" means "A program behaving like an OpenBTS
tranceiver and implementing the UDP based protocol of that", where the
preferred implementation used by most people with osmo-bts-trx is
probably "osmo-trx". It should probably still work with the original
OpenBTS TRX or with the one from yateBTS. Note that all of this is a
threoretical statement, I haven't used either of those configurations.
That's why I thought: maybe trx_sched_ is for all
BTS models?
It's always useful to look at a call graph.
Thanks for any clarification / confirmation :)
simply look at the git log. commit
5538f5cff824f19d5dc8781cbb93525ad45ad833 and those following explain
what was done and why it was done. The most important user I care about
is osmo-bts-virtual, which also needs all the L1 scheduling parts.
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)