18 Mar
2017
18 Mar
'17
6:06 p.m.
Hi Neels,
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 04:04:10PM +0100, Neels Hofmeyr wrote:
With steve, the name Osmocom-CN has kind of stuck, for
osmocom core network.
But again the HLR is separate and it's not really accurate. Osmocom-CN would
make sense if we have a joint BSC, MSC, SGSN and HLR repository.
No, it does not make sense seven in that case, because the BSC is not
part of the Core Network.
But what *is* our intended grouping? I (naively?)
tend to like complete
separation into separate BSC, separate MSC, separate SGSN, because it matches
the separation that the code is moving towards, and our redmine project tree.
yes, but what do we do until that is reached? It will be quite some
time until there is a stand-alone MSC with A interface.
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)