pysim Fakemagicsim problem + workaround Fwd: SIM Card Reader Problem!!

Second try. (I already sent this mail yesterday, but it did not appear in the mailinglist. I do not know why. Maybe because I attached a file (a patch)) Hi all, This is my first post to the OpenBSC mailinglist. I had a problem with the latest pysim version giving errors while trying to program 2G (Fake)MagicSIM cards. This had worked fine in the past with an older release from 2011. I tried al lot of versions in between. I was finally able to narrow it down to the commit that broke compatibility with (fake)magicsim: http://cgit.osmocom.org/pysim/commit/pySim/commands.py?id=8c1b33c439fef423c… The comment with this comit is: "Do not return the FCI information while selecting a file The sysmoUSIM-SJS1 card does not support returning the FCI information. Plus, the FCI information are not used anyway." If I revert the change with attached patch, it works again. But it may break sysmoUSIM-SJS1 compatibility. I am not sure on how to test whether the programming of sysmoUSIM-SJS1 still works fine and if the SIMS themselves then will still work as expected with OpenBSC or OpenBTS or OpenAirinterface. If the code needs to stay in for sysmoUSIM-SJS1 then we probably need somehing like the pseudocode below: if carttype is fakemagicsim: "a4000002" elif cardtype is sysmoUSIM-SJS1: "a4000C02" else: #What should be the default for the other cards? Or is there another solution? With best regards, Martin Dudok van Heel This is the patch inline (attaching it as a file, blocked my email from going through) mdvh_pysim_make_fakesim_work_again_patch_2016081201.diff diff --git a/pySim/commands.py b/pySim/commands.py index 721b3d4..b7fb77f 100644 --- a/pySim/commands.py +++ b/pySim/commands.py @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ class SimCardCommands(object): def select_file(self, dir_list): rv = [] for i in dir_list: - data, sw = self._tp.send_apdu_checksw(self.cla_byte + "a4000C02" + i) + data, sw = self._tp.send_apdu_checksw(self.cla_byte + "a4000002" + i) rv.append(data) return rv On 12-08-16 09:50, Holger Freyther wrote: