On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Harald Welte laforge@gnumonks.org wrote:
Hi all,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:20:16PM +0100, Holger Freyther wrote:
That would be appreciated and help us making the decision if we want to go with SMPP or a custom protocol. When there were customer requests at sysmocom we had always quoted SMPP work.
I think I could never figure out how to model the session-oriented properties of USSD on top of SMPP. I might have missed something and never really investigaed it all the way, but it seemed that SMPP can only be used for 'single shot' USSD transactions, rether than an USSD session with multiple messages.
To add to this discussion - one of the reasons we chose SUP over SMPP is that we're going to export other SS services as well.