On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 19:53, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Daniel Willmann dwillmann@sysmocom.de wrote:
looks all fine except for the function name. Something more expressive would be nice - how about gsm340_validity_period_as_ts()?
I'm not sure "as_ts" is really more expressive,
gsm340_validity_period_unix_time() would be more expressive, but it's also painfully long. I would suggest:
- gsm340_validity_time()
I like that one.
Regards,