15 May
2014
15 May
'14
3:58 p.m.
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 02:58:28PM +0200, Jacob Erlbeck wrote:
Why inline? We basically need the addresses of these functions.
Like it is done for most methods defined inside a header file. But you are right, we do not need the inline here.
It's quite some code duplication. What about something like the following (even if the resulting 'forward' declarations are somewhat senseless). This would even work with the ';' in the 'calling' code:
#define CTRL_CMD_DEFINE_RO(cmdname, cmdstr) \
...
CTRL_CMD_DEFINE(cmdname, cmdstr)
Good idea, I have done that and cleaned it up a bit further.