12 Jul
2013
12 Jul
'13
9:27 p.m.
Alexander Chemeris wrote:
No not the least. Compare:
rach access control classes 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0
with:
rach access control class 1 1
rach access control class 2 1
rach access control class 5 0
rach access control class 5 1
rach access control class 8 1
rach access control class 13 1
rach access control class 14 1
I know which I find clearer, and easier to manipulate with a minimum
of unwanted side effects.
"The connectivity to my sites suck" really can't motivate such a bad
user interface. Use mosh and/or train operators to deal with higher
latency connections.
//Peter
PS. Did you notice the error in my 'class' commands?
PPS. Did you notice the error in your 'classes' command?
The command
looks pretty horrible. Do you think that there could be a
better user interface than a single command with 16 parameters?
I'd suggest something like: rach access control class (0..15) (0|1)
I like our way more, as it's a single line vs many-many lines. A
single line doesn't occupy so much screen space and is easier to
manipulate from VTY or over a slow satellite connection (happen
frequently here). Also it gives you the whole picture in a single
glance.
Does it sound like a valid reason?