2 Sep
2013
2 Sep
'13
9:48 a.m.
On 08/31/2013 03:41 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 06:33:59PM +0200, Jacob Erlbeck wrote:
-class TestVTYNITB(TestVTYBase):
+class TestVTYGenericBTS(TestVTYBase):
Why BTS? NITB/BSC mostly define the BSC functionality. I would call it TestVTYGenericBSC. I can change it locally if you do not object.
Oops, that was a typo. Thanks for finding and fixing.
- def notIgnoredTest(self):
sys.stderr.write('Going to ignore the next assertion(s) due to known bugs\n')return FalseI am still a bit puzzled here. Is this statement still accurate? Specially because this is used with a if/else statement.
That's just an intermediate to keep the tests running until refactoring is done. So I didn't put much effort into this. We could even remove it with PATCH 5/6 of this set.