On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 05:25:16PM +0100, Jacob Erlbeck wrote:
Yes, C is not optimal for providing such a family of
functions.
Sheesh.
I'm kinda disappointed now. It seems C++ has the same kludge, though I
thought I remembered to have used <type> as const <type> implicitly
before... maybe some old memory from Java times long passed...
Thanks for the link! That one evaded me while searching.
And thanks for nothing, C *sulk*
;)
~Neels