Hello all
can anyone send me a openbsc.cfg file for nanobts 1900pcs....? because still i am struck
with my nanobts pcs1900.....i can send sms but no voice calls.....do i need to install
mISDN and LCR for single bts ? ....
thanks
regards
Rajitha Peiris
Sri lanka
________________________________
From: OpenBSC <openbsc-bounces(a)lists.osmocom.org> on behalf of
openbsc-request(a)lists.osmocom.org <openbsc-request(a)lists.osmocom.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 8:56:30 PM
To: openbsc(a)lists.osmocom.org
Subject: OpenBSC Digest, Vol 28, Issue 5
Send OpenBSC mailing list submissions to
openbsc(a)lists.osmocom.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.osmocom.org/mailman/listinfo/openbsc
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
openbsc-request(a)lists.osmocom.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
openbsc-owner(a)lists.osmocom.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of OpenBSC digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: MS cannot connect; Location Update Request not received
by BTS (Hossein Amini)
2. Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] gtp: merge gtp_get_net and
gtp_genl_find_dev (Harald Welte)
3. Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] gtp: make GTP sockets in
gtp_newlink optional (Harald Welte)
4. Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/6] gtp: consolidate pdp context
destruction into helper (Harald Welte)
5. Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] gtp: add socket to pdp context
(Harald Welte)
6. Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] gtp: unify genl_find_pdp and
prepare for per socket lookup (Harald Welte)
7. Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] gtp: misc improvements (Harald Welte)
8. Re: weekly test report (w5 2017) (Neels Hofmeyr)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 16:45:40 +0330
From: Hossein Amini <hosseinamini2578(a)gmail.com>
To: openbsc(a)lists.osmocom.org
Subject: Re: MS cannot connect; Location Update Request not received
by BTS
Message-ID:
<CAF81cShkO+JiamxQJXhqfpbOWxi9_8aEWsd5wTDhmZ0Vd912Xw(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I installed master branch now(4/feb/2017 at 18:30) and retry, but I can not
release channel and receive error in nitb.
I do not access to a external timing source like octoClock, do you use
external timing source? do you have a easy solution to check that?
My NITB log is like your log by 20170203014240662 and repeat. I retried
connecting about 10 min but nothing happened.
NITB log that repeat is:
20170204071216381 DRLL <0000> chan_alloc.c:352
(bts=0,trx=0,ts=0,pchan=CCCH+SDCCH4)
Allocating lchan=0 as SDCCH
20170204071216381 DRSL <0004> abis_rsl.c:1819 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=0,ss=0)
Activating ARFCN(0) SS(0) lctype SDCCH r=LOCATION_UPDATE ra=0x06 ta=0
20170204071216381 DRSL <0004> abis_rsl.c:580
(bts=0,trx=0,ts=0,pchan=CCCH+SDCCH4)
Tx RSL Channel Activate with act_type=INITIAL
20170204071216381 DRSL <0004> abis_rsl.c:1189 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=0,ss=0) state
NONE -> ACTIVATION REQUESTED
20170204071216381 DRSL <0004> abis_rsl.c:1546 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=0,ss=0)
CHANNEL ACTIVATE ACK
20170204071216381 DRSL <0004> abis_rsl.c:1189 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=0,ss=0) state
ACTIVATION REQUESTED -> ACTIVE
20170204071226381 DRSL <0004> abis_rsl.c:852 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=0,ss=0) RF
Channel Release due to error: 1
20170204071226381 DRSL <0004> abis_rsl.c:762 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=0,ss=0)
DEACTivate SACCH CMD
20170204071226381 DRSL <0004> abis_rsl.c:1189 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=0,ss=0) state
ACTIVE -> RELEASE DUE ERROR
20170204071226382 DRSL <0004> abis_rsl.c:925 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=0,ss=0) RF
CHANNEL RELEASE ACK
20170204071228382 DRSL <0004> abis_rsl.c:811 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=0,ss=0) is
back in operation.
20170204071228382 DRSL <0004> abis_rsl.c:1189 (bts=0,trx=0,ts=0,ss=0) state
RELEASE DUE ERROR -> NONE
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Neels Hofmeyr <neels(a)hofmeyr.de> wrote:
Dear Hossein,
the mailing list is indeed the proper place to ask. If no-one replied to
your
question, it either means that no-one knows the answer, or that no-one has
found the time to look into it. Don't be discouraged by that. Indeed I
would
prefer if you ask again on the mailing list instead of asking single mail
addresses. I actually saw your mail on the list and did not know what to
answer.
If you ask your question on-list again (possibly once a week), it might be
that
someone will come up with either an answer or with more questions that may
lead
you to a solution...
I sincerely hope that you will find a solution. It seems to me that it's
merely
a minor detail.
~N