30 Sep
2009
30 Sep
'09
2:49 p.m.
Hi Zecke,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 01:37:42PM +0200, Holger Freyther wrote:
On Wednesday 30 September 2009 13:23:10 Harald Welte wrote:
You are now redefiniing the LAC 0 to something like the opposite case, which I don't particularly like. Is there some alternative solution?
I didn't think about the IMSI DETACH case. One easy alternative is to use the other reserved lac value. With the least significant bit set 0 and all others to 1 (so 0xfffe... ETSI always makes me unsure about it).
I think LAC = 0xfffe seems to be the way to go for paging of all BTS, wile we keep LAC = 0 for the 'user is detached' case.
Regards,
--
- Harald Welte laforge@gnumonks.org http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)