15 Feb
2014
15 Feb
'14
5:44 p.m.
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:44:43AM +0100, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:28:59PM +0100, Jacob Erlbeck wrote:
Use 'var &= ~(1 << x)' to reset bits instead of 'var &= (1 << x)'.
oops. How did you find it? For how many different SI has rsl_rx_bcch_info be called? Which SI were invalid even if they should have been valid?
Ah nevermind. I didn't realize it applies to the osmo-bts. So "canceling" a SI would cause this grave defect to occurr but from what I see we don't do that.