18 Feb
2014
18 Feb
'14
9:41 a.m.
18 февр. 2014 г. 11:02 пользователь "Holger Hans Peter Freyther" <
holger(a)freyther.de> написал:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 04:50:42PM +0400, Ivan Kluchnikov wrote:
Good Morning,
Actually I think we should rather start enforcing that. Or do you know
situations when both TRX's could run on the same ARFCN?
+ llist_for_each_entry(cur_trx,
&trx->bts->trx_list, list) {
+ if (cur_trx->arfcn == arfcn) {
I wondered if we want to compare the access reference as well? We do not
enforce that the ARFCNs of a TRX are distinct. And besides that I would
like you to move the look-up code to a separate function. That way we can
at least write a unit test in the future.
+1
Please excuse typos. Written with a touchscreen keyboard.
--
Regards,
Alexander Chemeris
CEO/Founder Fairwaves LLC
http://fairwaves.ru