12 Jul
2013
12 Jul
'13
9:06 p.m.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Peter Stuge <peter(a)stuge.se> wrote:
Ivan Kluchnikov wrote:
I like our way more, as it's a single line vs many-many lines. A
single line doesn't occupy so much screen space and is easier to
manipulate from VTY or over a slow satellite connection (happen
frequently here). Also it gives you the whole picture in a single
glance.
Does it sound like a valid reason?
--
Regards,
Alexander Chemeris.
CEO, Fairwaves LLC / ООО УмРадио
http://fairwaves.ru
+DEFUN(cfg_bts_rach_ac_classes,
cfg_bts_rach_ac_classes_cmd,
+ "rach access control classes (0|1) (0|1) (0|1) (0|1) (0|1) (0|1) (0|1) (0|1)
(0|1) (0|1) x (0|1) (0|1) (0|1) (0|1) (0|1)",
+ RACH_STR
+ "Access control classes\n"
+ "Access control classes\n"
+ "Access control classes\n"
+ "Access is NOT barred for ACC 0\n"
+ "Access is barred for ACC 0\n"
+ "Access is NOT barred for ACC 1\n"
..
The command looks pretty horrible. Do you think that there could be a
better user interface than a single command with 16 parameters?
I'd suggest something like: rach access control class (0..15) (0|1)