4 Jul
2009
4 Jul
'09
9:18 a.m.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 06:44:15PM +0200, Holger Freyther wrote:
On Sunday 28 June 2009 18:47:31 Andreas.Eversberg
wrote:
I have just implemented this part of the patch and committed it.
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
patch 39: the location update process did not
work, if mobile station
uses tmsi when comming from a different network. in this case the
reject-timer must also be started, and we wait for imsi identity
response. in case we can't find the subscriber or if we have an
unimplemented location update, we release location update process and
send a reject.
Sorry, to me it seems the patch is doing something else...
1.)
if (!subscr) {
DEBUGPC(DRR, "<- Can't find any subscriber for this
ID\n");
/* FIXME: request id? close channel? */
+ release_loc_updating_req(lchan);
+ gsm0408_loc_upd_rej(lchan, reject_cause);
return -EINVAL;
}
I think we can just move the schedule_reject from two lines below the if to
the top. What do you think?