On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 09:55:30PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
Hi Sipos,
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 06:43:51PM +0200, Sipos Csaba wrote:
Just seen your branch regarding FSM:
I'm happy at least somebody notices this work :)
I've actually more than once yearned for the FSM, basically every time I'm fiddling with a request-response schema, tweaking timeout callbacks or trying to guard against messages coming in at the wrong time...
To me it seems that the FSM would improve correctness, reliability and maintainability at pretty much every interface I'm dealing with so far :)
I'm looking forward to the new HLR/VLR and seeing how it will work with Daniel's and my 3G CN stuff.
~Neels