1 Jun
2016
1 Jun
'16
6:36 p.m.
On Jun 1, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Max
<msuraev(a)sysmocom.de> wrote:
Hi.
I don't think hasty decisions would benefit anyone. Personally I favor
gerrit over patchwork because it's easier for me to grab particular
patch, fix it and than send back for review with gerrit taking care of
versioning, jenkins (re)test etc. I also have an impression that gerrit
gives better overview of awaiting patches which decrease the chance that
some patch would be "lost" in ML.
+1
If you're not going to be convinced to transition to evil proprietary closed software,
Gerrit is pretty nice for patch submitters and does seem to offer good CI integration and
overviews.
There are some serious advantages to GitHub, beyond ease of use and efficiency though.
You can see where we transitioned (Early 2010) from just mailing list patches to using
GitHub.
https://www.openhub.net/p/freeradius (See contributors Per Month graph)
-Arran
Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb(a)freeradius.org>
FreeRADIUS Development Team
FD31 3077 42EC 7FCD 32FE 5EE2 56CF 27F9 30A8 CAA2