13 Apr
2016
13 Apr
'16
12:39 p.m.
On 13 Apr 2016, at 05:18, Ivan Kluchnikov
<Ivan.Kluchnikov(a)fairwaves.ru> wrote:
Hi Holger,
Hi Ivan,
Yes, I agree that the current implementation is not enough flexible and it is a good idea
to use imsi-prefix instead of mcc and mnc, also it will fix the issue with 3 digit mnc.
yes? But how do you intend to fix it? The current structure will not be enough
Do you think it makes sense?
But I am not sure that I understand the idea of using regexp for the IMSI, could you
please clarify for which cases it could be useful?
I understand you want to fill a short-term gap but I don't think it is the right
approach to "roaming" at all. At the end of classic roaming one will:
* Get a yes/no if it is allowed to roam
* Get subscriber data (MSISDN, ...)
* The subscribed services (allowed to do telephony)
Right now the code is just about sending different network names. that seems very
different from roaming?
holger