Hi Neels,
Yes. I do have TCH/F_PDCH dynamic timeslots in the test procedure.
regards, Ivaylo
On 08.02.2017 16:26, Neels Hofmeyr wrote:
(found this mail stuck in my outbox, sending late)
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:09:23AM +0100, Ivaylo Kostov wrote:
Hi Harald,
I see. What was communicated to me was that NITB channel configuration TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH is not supported with nanoBTS.
I will have in mind that nanoBTS does not support HR (v1) codec.
Yes, we discussed TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH for the nanoBTS. I remember to be surprised because from some discussion it appeared that the nanoBTS supports HR, and I was expecting TCH/F only.
While talking about codecs, the ip.access nanoBTS *should* in fact support the TCH/F_PDCH dynamic timeslots. Ivaylo, could you check whether that is part of your testing procedure and add it if not?
~N
--
------------------------------ - Ivaylo Kostov ikostov@sysmocom.de mailto:ikostov@sysmocom.de http://www.sysmocom.de/ ======================================================================= * sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH * Alt-Moabit 93 * 10559 Berlin, Germany * Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B * Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Director: Harald Welte ------------------------------