Hi Neels,
Yes. I do have TCH/F_PDCH dynamic timeslots in the test procedure.
regards,
Ivaylo
On 08.02.2017 16:26, Neels Hofmeyr wrote:
(found this mail stuck in my outbox, sending late)
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:09:23AM +0100, Ivaylo Kostov wrote:
Hi Harald,
I see. What was communicated to me was that NITB channel configuration
TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH is not supported with nanoBTS.
I will have in mind that nanoBTS does not support HR (v1) codec.
Yes, we discussed TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH for the nanoBTS. I remember to be surprised
because from some discussion it appeared that the nanoBTS supports HR, and I
was expecting TCH/F only.
While talking about codecs, the ip.access nanoBTS *should* in fact support the
TCH/F_PDCH dynamic timeslots. Ivaylo, could you check whether that is part of
your testing procedure and add it if not?
~N
--
------------------------------
- Ivaylo Kostov <ikostov(a)sysmocom.de> <mailto:ikostov@sysmocom.de>
http://www.sysmocom.de/
=======================================================================
* sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH
* Alt-Moabit 93
* 10559 Berlin, Germany
* Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B
* Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Director: Harald Welte
------------------------------